…And Rachel said to Leah, "Give me, pray,

some of the mandrakes of your son."

And she said, "Is it not enough that you have

taken my husband

 and now you

would take the mandrakes of my son?"

And Rachel said, "Then let him lie with you

tonight

 in return for

the mandrakes of your son."

And Jacob came from the field in the evening

and Leah went out to meet him and said,

"With me you will come to bed, for I have clearly

hired you

 with the mandrakes

of my son"

(Bereishit 30: 14-16)

"Is it not enough that

you have taken my husband" For you should not have agreed to a second

wife [Lit. "Tsarati" Tsarah means "a second wife",

and also "trouble"], as is written,And you shall not take a woman to

be a second wife to her sister"; "and now you would take the

mandrakes of my son", increasing his love for you, and his hatred for

me?

"Then let him lie with

you tonight" So that the workings of the mandrakes and their supernatural

cure benefit you before me and you will not be harmed by giving of them to me

now, because whoever found these will find more, and especially because they

are ownerless, as the Sages pointed out (Bereishit

Raba 72:2).

            (Sforno, ibid., 16)

"With me you will come"

– To my tent, for each had her own tent for herself.

                                                                                                                        (RaDaK 30:16)

"And Leah went out to

meet him" Even though this was an act of impropriety, it was

preferable for her to forgo her honor rather than to embarrass Rachel by having

Yaakov leave her tent after he had already entered it.

(Haamek Davar, ibid., ibid.)

Tower, ladder, and house

Gil Nativ

In their book "That's

Not What's Written in the Bible", Yair Zakowitz and Avigdor Shinan present

an interesting argument regarding the beginning of 'Parashat Vayetzeh' – Yaakov's

dream, which ends with Yaakov naming the place where he slept 'Beit El' [House

of God] and setting up his stone pillow as a monument. They claim that the

story is an anti-thesis, a mirror image, of the Tower of Babel

narrative in Parashat Noah. Why?

The authors

maintain that the Torah desired to mock the Babylonian belief that the city of Babel was the gate to

heaven, the meeting place of heaven and earth, of gods and men. The original

name of 'Babel'

was 'Bab-Ilu' – Gate of the God'. The Biblical explanation is that the name was

created from the root b'l'l' – 'confusion' – of peoples and tongues. According

to the Biblical narrative, the tower was erected in the heart of the city at

the initiative of men in order to ascend to heaven, abode of the gods. This

version is authenticated by –  perhaps

even based upon – the ancient Babylonian story of the city's founding; one year

they burned bricks, the second year they built the tower to the height of the

heavens…

The authors

detail the contrasts through parallelisms. To note a few: In the 'Babel' story, the

initiative to reach heaven is of human origin. God descends from heaven to

observe the Babylonians' activities, and, as a result, He is angered, and

punishes them. In the 'Jacob's Ladder' story, the initiative for the meeting is

God's. Yaakov lies on the ground, on a low place, and God stands at the head of

the ladder. He does not descend, but sends angels, and subsequently He blesses

Jacob. This and yet more, the people of Babel

used bricks which they created with their own hands; Yaakov takes a stone from

nature, and transforms it into a monument.

Through the

contrast between the two stories, our fathers wished to say that the beliefs

and culture of the Babylonians constituted rebellion against God, arrogant

conceit, as compared with the faith of Israel and its culture, the salient

features of which are acceptance of the unbridgeable distance between God and

man, and self-education to humility and modesty in man's standing before his

creator.

The Babylonians'

feeling that they were able to reach the habitat of the God in heaven had its

origin primarily in the fact that Babel

was the greatest technological power in the era of the Patriarchs, and its

construction projects were among the wonders of the ancient world. I have no

doubt that modern Babel's

race to conquer the moon nurtures the contemporary belief that man has the

ability to reach everywhere, and there is nothing he cannot accomplish. It is

only a matter of time and financial investment in research and development, predict

NASA (U.S.

space agency) personnel, until man-made spaceships will be able to reach even

stars beyond the solar system. On the other hand, approximately once a decade,

a disaster occurs (such as the one in which the Israeli astronaught, Ilan

Ramon, was killed), sending us a reminder that we are but human beings, and

that even at the peak of our technological accomplishments we will not be

immune to error. And more – even though we succeed in lengthening our life

span, we shall still be mortal. Even more – even as we overcome tremendous

technological challenges, we still have great difficulty communicating with

each other because of humanity's profusion of languages, opinions, and cultures.

Yaakov is the

antithesis of the Babylonians' (ancient and modern) self-confidence. He

dedicates a simple unchiseled fieldstone to God who appeared to him in a dream.

His modest requests "bread to eat and a garment to wear" show that he

values and appreciates the simple gifts which God gives him daily and hourly,

and that he will educate his progeny not to be swept away by the intoxication

of those who boast "My strength and the power of my arm have produces this

wealth."

Yaakov is a

man searching for a place on earth, a tent-dweller and a wanderer who dreams

about building a house for the Lord who appeared to him. The word makom

From "And he came upon a certain place" through "How

fearsome is this place! This can be but the house of God…" All of

the three patriarchs encounter God in the open spaces of nature, in the field

and on the mountain. The Talmud (Pesahim 88a)

asks: Why will many nations say in the end of days "Come let us go up… to the

house of the God of Yaakov"? Why do they not say to house of the

God of Abraham or those of the God of Yitzchak? The reply is that

Abraham is remembered by virtue of "on the mountain God will be revealed";

Yitzchak goes to converse with his God in the field, and smells "the

fragrance of the filed which God has blessed"; only Yaakov vows to erect

for his God a 'house' – to compress` the divine presence into a manmade

building, which he will build with his own hands… this is his vow and this is

his hope as he sets out on his journey to the unknown.

Gil

Nativ is rabbi of Congregation Magen Avraham – a Masorti congregation – in

Omer.

And here, messengers of God

encountered him."

"Going up and down": First

ascending, then descending. Angels who accompanied him in the land did not exit

the land; they ascended to heaven, and angels of a foreign land descended to

accompany him.

(Rashi, Bereishit 28:12)

"Messengers of God

encountered him." Angels of Eretz Yisrael came towards him to

accompany him to the land. (Rashi, Bereishit

32:2)

…the angels of God are the

prophets, with reference to whom it is clearly said "And He sent an

angel;" and "An angel of God came up from Gilgal to

Bochim." How well put is the phrase ascending and

descending, –the ascent before the descent. for after

the ascent and the attaining of certain rungs on the ladder that may

be known comes the descent with whatever decree the prophet has been informed

of – with a clear view to governing and teaching the people of the earth.

 (Rambam, Guide

to the Perplexed, 1:15)

"As Yaakov went on his

camp of God." This matter of angels being perceived with the

physical eye can be explained either as a disguise of the angel – as in the

case of Yosef, "and a man discovered him", meaning that he

dressed in human garb – or as Yaakov having so sensitive an imagination as to

experience actual encounter one with the other. If one approaches his friend,

he is first discerned from afar, and only later is there physical contact. This

not the case with the angel. A human cannot see him from afar; only when he is

nearby is his capacity for (spiritual) perception sufficiently sharpened.

Similarly, our ancients explained (Bereishit

16:13) "Have I actually gone on seeing here after his seeing

me?" – since he (the heavenly messenger) had stopped talking to her,

she could no longer 'see' him [Trans. note – her seeing was a spiritual

experience, in effect as long the angel spoke to her]. Thus, with regard to our

passage: Even though they (the angels) were coming from Eretz Yisrael to meet

him, he did not see them from afar. Only they physically touched him, when they

were actually with him – when he needed them – then he discerned them and his

sight was purified. Therefore it says, "when he saw them" – after

making contact, and not prior to contact, for "This is a camp of

God!".

(Reb Meir Simcha of Dvinsk, Meshekh Hokhma, Bereishit 32:2-3)

…His is not an encounter between

two humans, but a meeting between Yaakov the man and angels. This is not

something which can be seen, because the angels which man sees are seen in his

consciousness. This seeing of angels is a metaphoric expression of man's inner

cognizance of God, and therefore man sees them only when they are within him,

in his consciousness . . . it should be noted that these ideas are articulated

by Reb Meir Simcha against the background of his knowledge of the Rambam's

doctrine of prophecy, in which "angels" are perceptions of the

imagination.

Leibowitz, Seven Years of Discussions of the Parasha of the Week)

very Journey Can Deteriorate,

Therefore One Must Pray that it Persevere Towards its Original Destination

Rabbi Abahu said: If God remains

with me, if He protects me baderekh [on this journey] that I am making – [this

is protection] from evil speech. How do we know this? From the verse that says

Vayidrekhu (they have trained) their tongues to speak falsely (Jeremiah 9) and gives me bread to eat – [this

is protection from] illicit sex, as it is written and he [Potiphar] knew

nothing accept the bread he ate – [bread,] this is a euphemism [for sex]. And

if I return safe [literally: in peace] to my father's house – [this is

protection] from bloodshed. The Lord shall be my God – [this is protection]

from idolatry.

(Bereishit Rabbah 70)

That is to say, that Jacob does

not ask that his own needs be seen to, rather he asks that God help him perform

his duties, that he spare him from the sins of evil speech, blood-shed, illicit

sex and idolatry. This vow is a very great religious commitment and is not

connected with payment of rewards.

(Prof. Yishayahu Leibowitz of blessed memory, He'arot Leparshiyot

Hashavua)

All Must Be Treated Justly

"It is still broad

daylight" – The righteous despise injustice even when perpetrated against

strangers, as it says, The unjust man is an abomination to the righteous, and

he whose way is straight is an abomination to the wicked (Proverbs 29:27).

(Seforno 29:7)

…here is revealed an unshakable

sense of justice and rectitude, similar to that of Moses, who also found his

future by a well. He too will not put up with neglect and misappropriation…

practical agility and love of work,

that quickly sends forth a helping hand, even when it is none of his affair, a

quality standing almost in contradiction to the character of a mild man who

stayed in camp.

(R. Samson Raphael Hirsch, 29: 10-12)

…to let you know that

contemplation and isolation, and the avoidance of life's crowds and clamor are

not the signs of one close to God and of one to whom the divine presence has

been revealed. Rather, such a person carries his banner among his fellows,

performs deeds – even involving the most banal of everyday matters. He involves

himself in everyday actions in order to promote justice.

(Nehamah Leibowitz, Studies in Bereishit [Hebrew edition], p. 219)

Give Me Leave – And I Will Go

To My Place, to My Land"

Place, Land, Birthplace

Yitro said (Bemidbar 10:30): "To my land and

to my birthplace I will go"; geographically speaking, this is the

correct order; one cannot be in his dwelling place unless he is found in his

land. But the situation was different with Yaakov; he had a dwelling place, but

he had no land. The land was only a goal, it was a land of the future.

Therefore, it seems, he said: ""u'lartsi" (connoting

"for the sake of my land"), rather than "el artsi"

– meaning only "to my land." The land, as it is today, does not

attract him; upon his return he will be no closer to it than when he was Avram.

But when he will build his home in his birthplace, he will live for the

sake of the land of his future. He will raises his family in that

place, which is destined to become the land of his grandchildren's birthplace.

(Hirsch, Bereishit 30:25)

 And He Fled, He with All

that was His

He [Jacob] had not been promised

this [that he would be able to take all of his possessions with him], and that

is why he had to resort to this trick. Even though it was not easy to travel a

long time without Laban finding out, he was sure that divine providence would

keep him from knowing. However, human notions of providence are not those of

God. Rather he did find out and gave chase and caught up with him, but in any

event he was saved by God. Such are the ways of Israel; they are always sure

that divine providence will be with them in the path they choose to follow, yet

the Holy One Blessed Be He disrupts their plans in order to cause them distress

and purify them, or for some other reason. In any case, he does save them and

protect them in a different manner that they never thought of… However, it

would have been preferable if he had not hidden himself from Laban and had not

come to theft of the Terafim that caused Jacob great evil.

(Ha'Emek Davar 31:21)

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom,

please consider contributing towards its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel

  $700

• English edition distributed via email $ 100

Issues may be dedicated in honor

of an event, person, simcha, etc. Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to

appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in advance to appear in the English email.

About us

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a

movement dedicated to the advancement of a civil society in Israel. It is

committed to promoting the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and justice,

concepts that have always been central to Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares

a deep attachment to the land

of Israel and it no less

views peace as a central religious value. It believes that Jews have both the

religious and the national obligation to support the pursuit of peace. It

maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a fair and just

society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an option but an

imperative.

4,500 copies of a 4-page peace

oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are written and published by Oz

VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are

sent overseas via email. Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il.

Shabbat Shalom is available on

our website: www.netivot-shalom.org.il

For responses and arranging to

write for Shabbat Shalom: pleiser@netvision.net.il