“So Yaakov served seven years for Rachel and they seemed to him but a
few days because of his love for her.” (Bereishit
29:20)

“Because of his love for her” – “For love disregards the line.” (Depending upon the context, “love disregards the line”
may mean: “Love disregards accepted conduct”; “Love distorts logic and reason”;
“Love distorts perception”.)

(Sforno ibid., ibid.)

“But a few days”: On The Relativity Of Time And Difficulty.

“And they seemed to him but a few days because of his love for her.”
– Because of his great love for her, seven years’ work for her was but a
small price; were Laban to have set a higher price, Yaakov would have worked
longer.

An alternative explanation: After he had worked, they seemed but a few
days, but during the work, they seemed like many days, because of his great
love for her.

(Hizkuni Bereishit 29;20)

“In the many days after that the king of Egypt died” – in periods
of distress they are called ‘many’ and in times of joy, they are called ‘few’,
as is written, “and they seemed to him but a few days because of his love
for her.” This means: After it had passed, the period of enslavement seemed
short.

(Hizkuni
Shemot 2:23)

Rabbi Yehuda expounded: In the future, The Holy One, Blessed Be He, will
bring the yetser hara – the evil inclination – and will slaughter it
before the righteous and the wicked. For the righteous, it will seem like a
high mountain, and to the wicked it will seem like a thin hair; these will weep
and these will weep. The righteous will weep, saying: “How could we have
conquered so high a mountain?”

And the wicked will weep, saying: “How could we not have overcome this
thin hair?”

So The Holy One, Blessed Be He, will wonder along with them, as is
written, (Zecharia 8): “Thus said the Lord of Hosts: Though it will seem
impossible to the remnant of this people in those days, shall it also be
impossible to Me?”

(Bavli Sukkah 52b).

HE CAME ACROSS A
CERTAIN PLACE

Ronen Ahituv

            After
the dream of the ladder (28:20-22),
Yaakov takes a peculiar vow. As with many oaths, this oath, too, is
conditional. The condition stipulated is: “If God remains with me, if He
protects me on this journey that I am making, and gives me bread to eat and
clothing to wear”; the vow itself seems to be: “The Lord shall be
my God. And this stone etc.”. The difficulties dealt with by our
commentators deal with difficulties presented by both parts of the vow.

            The
condition itself is problematic, for just moments before, Yaakov had dreamt a
dream in which he was promised, among other things: “I am with you; I
will protect you wherever you go and will bring you back to this land”. How
can Yaakov doubt a divine promise, given absolutely, with no strings attached?

            A
much more serious problem arises from the vow itself: How can Yaakov dare
express his acceptance of the Lord as his God as conditional – dependent upon
something which may come to pass in the future?! Is not the Lord his God now?
And even should Yaakov not return safely to his father’s house, is it
conceivable that the Lord will not be his God?!

            These
questions have received many answers, many of which attempt to sidestep the
plain reading (peshat) of the verses. For example, we cite two solutions
to the first problem suggested in Bereishit Rabba (70:4).

            The
first solution is that “the parasha has been transposed,” meaning that the vow
was taken before Yaakov dreamt his vision, before God had promised to protect
him throughout his sojourning.

            The
second solution ignores the plain meaning of “and will protect me”, which
means protection of Yaakov from various external dangers – interpreting it
instead as protection of Yaakov against sin and transgression. According to
this approach, Yaakov has no doubts about fulfillment of God’s promises to him;
he questions his own power to withstand the tests which await him. This
explanation emphasizes the dread of Yaakov – and probably of the darshan
himself – of the dangers, the enticements and the tests which await him as he
goes into an exile with an unforeseeable ending.

            But
still, after reading all these midrashim, we are not satisfied, for “The
text never waives its plain meaning.”

            Perhaps
it is possible to solve the two problems by closely observing the psychological
and existential condition of Yaakov, from his birth until his return from
Harran.

            Yaakov
never reconciled himself to the fact that he was born second to Esav. “In
the womb he tried to supplant his brother” (Haftara), and he availed
himself of every opportunity to demonstrate his desire to transform reality,
the significance of which was clear to the entire family: To Esav, the
firstborn, belongs the birthright, and, like Yitzhak before him, he will
inherit the blessing of Avraham. Yaakov’s fate is to be expulsion from the
family home, as were Yishmael and the sons of Avraham’s concubines, or to serve
his brother, as stated “and the older shall serve the younger.”

            The
pathetic attempts of Yaakov and Rivka to purchase the birthright and to steal
the blessing were considered by Yitzhak to be acts of deception, and entangled
Yaakov in the enmity of both Esav and Yitzhak.

            Throughout
all this family contention, we do not hear the voice of God. He does not reveal
his position and does not rule in the sibling rivalry. In the absence of any
other reaction, all assume that He stands on the side of the simple facts and
of law, according to which “he may not treat the firstborn… in disregard . .
who is elder.” (Devarim 21:15) Yitzhak
is convinced of this elementary truth, and acts accordingly. Gradually, the
awareness seeps into Yaakov’s heart; I, Yaakov, am the rejected son. The
conflict with Esav has not only not furthered my aims, it has led to the
hastening of the resolution and my present expulsion from my father’s house.
All the signs point in this direction: the father of the chosen people, the
nation of God, will be Esav. To him will the Lord be God, whereas I will be “a
fugitive Aramean”, like other rejected family members.

            Somewhere,
however, deep in the recesses of Yaakov’s consciousness, the flame of rebellion
still burns; something in his subconscious still refuses to resign to reality,
continues to hope that the impossible be realized, to believe that he will
return victoriously to his father’s home. To these ends, he must contend not
only with his brother Esav, but with God Himself. This hope overwhelms his
thought in his dream: in the dream Yaakov holds his ground and struggles
against the fate determined for him by God. “Vayifga bamakkom” [= “encountered
a certain place”; but “vayifga” has a connotation of ‘attacked’, and
“bamakkom” has a connotation of ‘God’, ergo, “he fought with God”]; in
his consciousness transpires the struggle against God and man, that struggle
which will recur upon his return from Harran with great wealth. In his dream,
Yaakov takes upon himself the Promethean position of man struggling with the
gods and winning. Thus do the Sages describe Yaakov’s dream:

“As iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens
the face of his friend” (Proverbs 27:17) –
Said Rav Hamma ben Hanina: A knife is sharpened only against the blade of
another knife; so a scholar is ‘sharpened’ only through argument with his
companion… “a man” – this is Yaakov; since Yaakov stood… the Shekhina
rested solely upon him”. (Bereishit Rabba 69:2)

            This
Midrash stresses the challenge with which Yaakov presents his God, as an equal
opponent and as a sharp blade.

            In
his dream, Yaakov succeeds in receiving God’s blessing and the desired
position; but in the morning, upon awakening, despair returns and creeps in: Dreams
do not speak the truth!

            This
is the background against which the vow and Yaakov’s negotiations with his God
can be explained.

            Yaakov
will continue to be tossed about in the storm of doubt for twenty years: Am I
the chosen one, or am I no more than a dissembler, who deceives even himself?
Can I change reality itself, can I repair the past of my being born second, can
I determine my future – or are these beyond reach? Is my place in Canaan or in
Harran?

            This
existential condition, of a doubt-ridden life, of constant tension between hope
and despair, between belief in a lofty destiny or in a day-to-day debasing
reality, is very familiar to modern man. Father Yaakov shows us the way to
exist in a world of doubt. Yaakov refuses to be swept away by the currents of
reality; he will force it to bless him.

            The
puzzle will be solved for Yaakov only when – in the coming parasha – he bravely
confronts his brother. Only then will he meet God “face to face”, and
receive confirmation that his soul has been saved and that he has earned God’s
grace. The meeting with his brother Esav is for him a meeting with the reality
which has pursued him since birth, which he had interpreted as reflecting the
will of God who chose Esav. Therefore Yaakov says to his brother “For to see
your face is like seeing the face of God, and you have received me favorably.”

Ronen Ahituv lives in Mitzpeh Netofah in the Lower Galilee,
and is a fellow in the Oranim Midrasha

Land and the Father’s Home

“And I return safely to my father’s home” – Even though He had
promised him to return him to the land, but [now he asks] that the return be in
peace, that he not be beaten and harrassed, and that the return will be not
only to the land but also to ‘my father’s house’.

The Test of Faith Is in Situations of Relative Security

“And the Lord shall be my God” – the sense of the language
indicates that the statement is [not one of the conditions, but rather an] effect. It means the Yaakov will not depend on his strength and power, but he
will always see God before him, He will lead him. When he was abroad, in the
house of Laban, and he could not depend upon himself, it is obvious that for
his own sake he asked that God be with him and not forsake him. But in his
father’s home he could have depended upon himself; his vow, then, was that even
then the Lord will be his God.

 (Haamek Davar 28:21)

“And Leah’s eyes were rakkot”; (“Rakkot” has been interpreted as “soft”, “weak”, “delicate”, and
“pleasant”.) Praise or Deprecation? According To Its Plain Meaning (Peshat)
Or According To It’s Homiletic Exposition (derash)?

Rachel was deserving that Yaakov’s firstborn emanate from her, as is
written (Bereishit 37) “These are the
begettings of Yaakov, Yosef”, but Leah anticipated her with prayer. On
account of Rachel’s humility, however, The Holy One, Blessed Be He restored it
[the status of the firstborn] to her.

Where do we see that Leah preceded her in prayer? As is written (Bereishit 29), “And Leah’s eyes were
‘rakkot” – What is meant by ‘rakkot? If we say literally “rakot” [=
weak], is it possible that the Torah, which avoided speaking in derogatory
fashion about impure animals, as is written, (Bereishit 7) “From the animal
which is pure and from the animal which is not pure” [instead of “impure”
animals] – should speak in derogatory manner about saintly persons!? Rabbi
Eliezer, however, says: “Because her gifts were long-lasting [long-lasting = arukkot.
The long-lasting gifts referred to are the lineages of the Cohanim and
Levites which were to descend from Leah]. Rav said: “Rakkot”, i.e.,
weak, but this is not a derogatory term. It is rather laudatory. For when she
would hear, at the crossroads, people saying that “Rivka has two sons, Laban
has two daughters; the elder for the elder, the younger for the younger”. She
would sit at the crossroads and ask: “What does the elder do?” “He is a wicked
man who robs people.” “What does the younger do?” “A simple man who dwells
in tents”, and she would weep until she shed her eyelids, and thus it is
written: “And God saw that Leah was despised.” What is meant by “despised”?
If we say “despised” literally, is it possible? The Torah avoided speaking
derogatorily of impure animals, would it speak derogatorily of saints? But The
Holy One, Blessed Be He saw that she despised Esav’s behavior, and therefore he
opened her womb.

(Bavli, Bava Bathra 123a)

“And Leah’s eyes were
rakkot”

Thrice [does the word “ve’eyney”
– “the eyes of”] appear at the beginning of a verse; here, “And the eyes
of Israel were heavy with age” (Bereishit 48:10) and “The eyes of the wicked pine away” (Job 11:20). Why were her eyes “rakkot”? Because
she feared lest she marry Esav, and similarly, “And the eyes of Israel were
heavy with age” – because he foresaw Yerovam and Ahav descending from him.
This is [the meaning of the three passages]: “And Leah’s eyes were
rakkot” and “the eyes of Israel were heavy with age” because of “the
eyes” – of the wicked.

“Rakkot” – Appears twice in the Bible; “And
Leah’s eyes were rakkot”, “Will he speak soft [“rakkot”] words with
you?” (Job
40:27), because she would speak
to him [to Yaakov] softly; nevertheless, he did not love her.

(Baal
HaTurim, Bereishit 29:17)

“And Leah’s eyes were rakkot” – Onkelos translated: “Ya-een” meaning
“pleasant”, and so translated Rashbam. The meaning is that her eyes were
pleasant, but because they were so soft, she could not herd the sheep, because
the light of the sun would hurt them.

(Haamek Davar 29:17)

What Is The Difference
Between a Shifha (Maid) and an Amma (Handmaid)? What is the
Difference Between Sarah and Rachel?

“So that I too may be built
up with sons through her” – What
is meant by “too”? She said to him: “Your grandfather Avraham had sons
from Hagar, and he girded his loins [in prayer] on behalf of Sara.” He said to
her:” My grandmother brought an associate wife into her house.” She replied:
“If this is what is hindering, here is my handmaid “So that I too may be
built up with sons through her” – like Sara.”

(Rashi
Bereishit 30:3)

“She said: Here is my handmaid Bilha; come into her, so that she may
give birth upon my knees…” – Not as Sara said “Come into my maid (shifhati)”
, for Rachel had freed her and she was called only a “handmaid” (amma), as
with “the Hebrew handmaid” (amma ha’ivriya). Later, however, she is
referred to as a “shifha”, because she continued to serve as before.

“So that I too may be built
up with sons through her” (16:2) – Rachel said: “So
that she may give birth upon my knees, so that I too may be built up with sons
through her.” Her intention was that she would raise the infant, and it
would be as though she herself had born him. Such was not the case with Sara,
who did not want to raise the son of her maid; therefore she said “Perhaps
I will be built up with sons” – that I may have some merit and be
positively remember by her seed.”

(Haamek Davar Bereishit 30:3)

Editorial Board: Pinchas Leiser (Editor), Miriam Fine (Coordinator),
Itzhak Frankenthal and Dr. Menachem Klein

Translation: Kadish Goldberg

This weekly publication was
made possible by:

The Moriah Fund, the Tisch
Foundation and private donors

To our readers:

We will be happy to have you actively participate in “Shabbat Shalom”
by:

·        Letters
to the editor

·    Publication of Divrei Torah
(in coordination with the editorial board)

·    Membership in Oz V’Shalom –
Netivot Shalom and payment of dues.

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards
its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel $1000
• English edition distributed via email $ 100

Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc.
Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in
advance to appear in the English email.

Tax-exempt contributions to OzveShalom may be made through the New
Israel Fund or through P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc.

Contributions should be marked as donor-advised to OzveShalom/Netivot
Shalom.

New Israel Fund, POB 53410, Jerusalem 91534 (Please include Israeli
address and telephone number)

New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New Israel Fund of Canada, 801 Eglinton Ave. West, Suite #401, Toronto,
Ontario M5N 1E3 Canada

New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street, London W1H 2DD,
United Kingdom

P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite 607, New
York, New York 10017 USA

About us

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of
a civil society in Israel. It is committed to promoting the ideals of
tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts which have always been central to
Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of
Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value. It believes
that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to support the
pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a
fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an
option but an imperative.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom`s programs include both educational and
protest activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences and weekend
programs are held for students, educators and families, as well as joint
seminars for Jews, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities focus on
issues of human rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and responses to
issues of particular religious relevance.

9,000 copies of a 4 page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah
reading are written and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are
distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom`s educational forums draw people of different
backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to deepen their Jewish
knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint on the subjects of
peace and social issues.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom fills an ideological vacuum in Israel’s
society. Committed both to Jewish tradition and observance, and to the
furthering of peace and coexistence, the movement is in a unique position to
engage in dialogue with the secular left and the religious right, with Israeli
Arabs and with Palestinians.

Our activities are funded by donations and volunteers.

Pob 4433                                             Email:
ozshalom@netvision.net.il

Jerusalem 94310, Israel