And Isaac's servants dug in the valley,

and they found there a well of living waters.

And the shepherds of Gerar quarreled with Isaac's shepherds…

so he named the well Esek (Bereishit 26:19-20)

So he

named the well Esek – He gave it a name so that

when the day came when he would overpower them Gerar's shepherds would not be

able to say, "The well is ours."

And the

shepherds of Gerar quarreled – Since the spring-water originated

in the hills, they had a basis to claim, "The water is ours." 1)

Because the spring water came out of the hill that was in Gerar, within

Abimelech's border. 2) Because it was the law of the kingdom that anything

found underground belonged to the kingdom, and if so, the underground water

belonged to the king and to the citizens of the state. Isaac's shepherds argued

that underground water has no owner, and so they called the well Esek ["an

affair"], because there was an affair with arguments and

counter-arguments, each side having an argument for their own opinion.

(Malbim

ad loc)

And they did not quarrel over the

third well, for the Third Temple will be built by the king Messiah of whom it

is said (Isaiah 9:6): for the

increase of the realm and for peace without end, for

there will be only peace and truth in his time. Thus was it called Rehovot, for then the Lord will expand (yarhiv) their borders. When there is strife or two

Hebrews fighting, even in a city as large as Antioch, there is not enough room for them

both even in a very great area; the lack of space oppresses them, as is the

case even today, due to our sins. The opposite is the case when there is peace

among Israel.

Even though we multiply and the Land's inhabitants are numerous, nevertheless

it is expansive for them and there is no oppressor… that when peace is

found we shall be fruitful in the land for we will not need to leave it.

(Kli Yakar Bereishit 26:19)

Isaac,

Lord of the Land – and the Philistines

Menachem

Klein

Isaac had no reason to doubt that he

was the owner of the land of his birth, the land to which his parents had

immigrated. He was sure the divine promise would be fulfilled:

…for to you and to your seed will I give

father (26:3).

It is a fact: he

did behave like the lord of the land. When visiting the land of the Philistines

he took liberties unusual for a guest, and acted as if he were the landowner: Abimelech, the king of the Philistines, looked out of the

window, and he saw, and behold, Isaac was jesting with Rebecca his wife (26:8).

How does someone

behave if he considers himself to be the lord of the land and how does he treat

the native Philistines? Despite his wealth and power he does not wage war

against the Philistines who stop up his wells. After leaving the site of the

first quarrel and digging a well elsewhere, he did not wage war against the

Philistine shepherds who claimed the water is ours (26:20). Even the third time he did not fight

the Philistines over the water-sources.

Isaac was

certainly not pleased by the repeated altercations with the Philistines. We may

assume that he was frustrated and exposed to pressures from his own shepherds

to retaliate against the Philistines and answer them in the only language they

understood – the language of force. However, Isaac restrained himself. He

expressed his frustration in the names he gave to the wells he lost to the

Philistines. Those names address the Philistine opposition. And he gave them names like the names that his father had

given them (26:19).

That is to say: not the names given them by the Philistines. It

was clear to him in his own mind that he and his father were the lords of the

land and the owners of the wells, but in practice he respected the natives and

even honored the gains they made by taking wells away from him by force.

Isaac documents

the repeated confrontations with the Philistines with the names he gave to the

wells: so he named the well Esek, because they had

contended with him…And they dug another

well, and they quarreled about it also; so he named it Sitnah (26:20, 21). However,

Isaac avoided perpetuating the conflict through struggle. He was sure he was

the lord of the land. The Philistines' actions and their take-over of the well

did not undermine his certainty of his general ownership of the land. Isaac

thought that if he reacted it might be understood as implying that ownership of

the land depended upon the possession of one particular well or another. Isaac

preferred digging new wells: And he moved away from there, and he dug

another well, and they did not quarrel over it (26:22). He gave that

well a name bearing a positive connotation: Rehoboth. The explication of that

name expresses that same confidence which guided Isaac through the entire

struggle: so he named it Rehoboth, and he said, "For now the Lord has

made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land" (26:22).

The positive meaning of that name also includes a clear

message: now God has made room for us and now we will be able to blossom. If we

had begun a confrontation regarding the earlier wells we would not have enjoyed

the ability to be fruitful in the land.

Isaac's constructive policy proves itself again later. Isaac

was neither naïve nor blind to reality. He was aware of the Philistines'

hatred and he even took pains to mention it to them: Why have you come to

me, since you hate me, and you sent me away from you? (26:27). Even so he

preferred not to respond with force and not to impose peace by force. Isaac saw

no need to use force to get the Philistines to offer him a pact of peace.

We have seen that the Lord was with you; so we said:

a covenant with you (26:28).

Once again Isaac teaches us how the lord of the land behaves.

Isaac harbors harsh memories and feelings from his confrontations with

the Philistines. Those memories and feelings, together with his

self-recognition as lord of the land, could have brought him to reject the

Philistines' peace proposal. They could have led Isaac to force the Philistines

to agree to a peace of the vanquished that would have reflected his status as

lord of the land, an agreement which would have established in reality what he

actually thought in his heart about himself and the Philistines. However, Isaac

acted completely otherwise. He accepted the Philistines' proposal of reciprocal

peace. It was formulated in language that Isaac could have rejected because it

humiliated him; it opened by describing him as the bad guy of the story, the

one who schemed at wreaking vengeance upon the Philistines or expanding into

their territory: If you do [not] harm us, as we have

in peace (26:29).

But Isaac honored the Philistines' gains and did not trample

them down in the negotiations. He recognized that they had made gains in

the wars of the shepherds and therefore – as far as they were concerned – it

was a balanced and bilateral agreement of non-belligerence without further

demands or counter-demands. And more than this, Isaac was able to see deeply. He

understood that behind the language that depicted him negatively there hid fear

of him, and behind that fear recognition not only of his power but also of his

being the lord of the land. People are only afraid of the lord of the land. Isaac's

ability to see deeply generated brotherhood with the Philistines and brought

peace. And they arose early in the morning, and they

swore one to the other [literally: each man to his brother]…and

they went away from him in peace (26:31).

Dr. Menachem Klein teaches in

the Department of Political Science at Bar Ilan University.

Rebecca is the Mother

of Jacob and Esau

Why did the Torah

see fit to remind us once more – after Rebecca sent/smuggled Jacob away from

Esau's vicinity, keeping Esau from venting his rage – why did the Torah remind

us that she was mother to both Jacob and Esau?

The words of the

super commentary Tzeida La-Derekh on Rashi ring true:

This comes to tell us that she did not act only as Jacob's mother when she

smuggled out Jacob, saving him from death. Rather, she was also acting as

Esau's mother, saving him from murdering his brother. Although throughout the

chapter she had been viewed as acting solely for the sake of Jacob, her

younger son (27:42), at the moment of

greatest danger her actions are explained by her role as mother of Jacob and

Esau (28:5); she did not want to be

bereft of them both in the same day.

(Prof. Nehama Leibowitz, z"l, Iyyunim be-Sefer Bereishit, pg. 202)

To ask

after the Lord: an effort to know the

future, to influence it, or to pray?

And

he went to ask after the Lord: Rashi writes: to say what will be in the

end, but I have not found the word ask after except in the meaning of,

"to pray," as it says in Psalms 34:5: I asked after the Lord, and

He answered me; They asked after me and lived (Amos 5:4); and, May I live if I ask after

you (Ezekiel 20:3).

(RaMBaN Bereishit 25:22).

A Blessing from God Cannot be

Inherited. Rather, a Person Must be Worthy of it.

The Lord blessed Abraham that his seed

would be chosen to be the nation that He chose as a heritage, so that God would

be their Lord and place His presence within them, and they would inherit the

land and be holy to their God. Abraham did not pass this blessing on to Isaac,

because it is not within human power to bequeath it to one's children, because

it depends on the sanctity of the people and the goodness of their actions,

Only after the death of Abraham did God give this blessing to Isaac, and Isaac

did not intend to bless his sons with the blessing of Abraham, because he knew

that his blessing would not be effective, for only someone ready for it

can be blessed that way by God.

(Malbim on Bereishit 27,1)

The Many Faces

of Esau

His name is Esau [Eisav] for he is formed [asuy]

and completed. Eisav, whose numerical value is

shalom, for if he had not been named "peace," he would have

destroyed the world. Another idea: Eisav

is [the letter] "ayin [= 70, followed

by the word,] shav." This shav [pointless one] completed the number of

70 nations that I created in my world.

(Baal ha-Turim, Bereishit 25:25).

Shalom:

Its numerical value is [the same as] Eisav,

for one should be first to greet every person, even a gentile.

(Baal ha-Turim Bamidbar 6:26)

…the Baal ha-Turim's second explanation is much deeper, when he says

"Shalom: Its numerical value is [the same as] Eisav"…

and as has been stated, this is talking about the priestly blessing, meaning –

the blessing of peace to Israel

is not complete as long as there is no peace for Esau as well. It

may be said that in Toldot, the numerical value of Eisav is shalom in order to restrain Esau,

while in the priestly blessing, the numerical value of Eisav

is shalom in order to inform the People Israel how strongly they are

commanded to make peace, and that there will be no peace for Israel as long as

there is no peace between Jacob and Esau.

(Prof. Y. Leibowitz, z"l, Sheva Shanim Shel Sihot

al Parashat ha-Shavua,

pg. 110).

So Jacob drew close to his father Isaac, who felt him

hands of Esau."

(Bereishit 27:22)

The voice is the voice of Jacob – No prayer

is ever effective without the participation of Jacob's offspring.

 Yet the hands are the hands of Esau –

No war is ever won without the participation of Esau's offspring in it.

Caution is Required when we try to Understand the

Present on the Basis of the Past

These blessings invite several difficult questions. If the

blessing was a prophecy, how could he not know who he was blessing?… it seems correct to me that the prophet's blessing is a

kind of prayer, and God hears his prayer, since this blessing principally

concerns their offspring. There are those who have not awakened from their

foolish slumber who think that we are still in the exile of Edom. But this is not so – Edom was under Judah's

control, and so it is written, Thus Edom

control (II Kings 8:22). Yoav also killed off every male in Edom (I Kings 11:16). Since it [Edom] was under Judah's

control, they rejoiced on the day of our catastrophe [the destruction of the

first Temple],

and told the Babylonians, Strip her, strip her, to her very foundations (Psalms 137:7). It was especially humiliating

for Israel that Edom would humiliate them in their evil…. in

the days of Agripas, when Jerusalem was under

siege and the Edomite forces came to Judah's aid. The people which

exiled us was derived from the Kittim, and so the translator rendered Ships

came from the quarter of Kittim (Bamidbar

24:24) [as referring to Rome], that is

the Greek Kingdom, as I explained in my commentary

on the Book of Daniel. There were but a few people who believed in the new

faith [Christianity]. When many came to believe in it in the days of Constantine, who had renewed the religion entirely, and

there had been [until that time] no one in the world who observed the religion

as "Edom"].

and Ethiopia and Elam

are referred to as Ishmaelites, but there but a few real descendents of the

Ishmaelites among them.

(Ibn Ezra on Bereishit 27:40)

Jacob 's Moral Conflict

And he went and

took it and brought it to his mother [va

'yelekh, va 'yikah, va 'yavi] (Bereishit 27:14) – coerced, subordinate, and crying.

(Bereishit Rabbah 65)

This may be a derasha

on va 'yelekh, va 'yikah, va 'yavi – "vay"

(RaDaL on Bereishit Rabbah)

God

Shows No Favoritism

Whoever

says that the Holy One, Blessed Be He, is lenient – may his intestines be torn

out. Rather, He is forbearing, but eventually he collects his debts. Esau cried

one scream because of Jacob, as is written, When Esau heard his father's

words he cried out with a very great and bitter cry. And where was

he repaid? In Shushan, as is written, And he (Mordecai) cried out

with a great and bitter cry (Esther 4).

(Bereishit Rabbah 67)

In

Midrash Rabbah they (the Sages) said that our father Jacob was punished for

causing Esau to cry a very great and bitter cry, resulting in Mordecai's

crying a great and bitter cry. There seems to be a difficulty – why was

he (Jacob) punished for Esau's scream more severely than was (pained) his

righteous father Isaac, who trembled with very great trembling? [Trans.

note – the adjective "bitter" appears only with reference to Esau's

cry, not to Isaac's trembling]. . It seems to me: Jacob performed his

transgression in good faith (lishma). He derived no pleasure from

Yitzhak's trembling; he was certainly sorry about that, but he was coerced (by

his mother Rebecca) to sin. This was not the case with regards to Esau's cry; he

was happy about that, and therefore he was punished, because he had brought

it about by the sin of lying, and one may not derive any pleasure from that.

(NeTzIV, Harhev Davar, Bereishit 27: 9, note 1)

Midrashei Tzafon

From the pen of our member, Ronen Ahituv

And Isaac loved Esau (25:28)

Three people loved the field: Cain, Esau, and Isaac.

Cain, for it is said: worker of the land. Esau, for it is said: man

of the field. Isaac, for it is said: and Isaac planted seeds, and he

was told: dwell in the land.

That is why it is written: and Isaac loved Esau.

Another explanation: Why and Isaac loved Esau? Because and

Rebecca loved Jacob.

He knew she had been told and your seed shall conquer the gates of

its enemies and she had been told, and one nation will be stronger than

the other.

He said: "If I choose Jacob, as she has, Esau will be his enemy and

I will be bereft of my son Esau."

Therefore it says: and Isaac loved Esau.

If you wish to subscribe to the email English editions of Shabbat

Shalom, to print copies of it for distribution in your synagogue, to inquire

regarding the dedication of an edition in someone’s honor or memory, to find

out how to make tax-exempt donations, or to suggest additional helpful ideas,

please call +972-52-3920206 or at ozshalom@netvision.net.il

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards

its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel

  $700

• English edition distributed via email $

  100

Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc.

Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in

advance to appear in the English email.

About us

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of

a civil society in Israel.

It is committed to promoting the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and justice,

concepts that have always been central to Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of Israel and it no less views peace as a

central religious value. It believes that Jews have both the religious and the

national obligation to support the pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish

law clearly requires us to create a fair and just society, and that

co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an option but an imperative.

4,500 copies

of a 4-page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are written

and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are distributed to over

350 synagogues in Israel

and are sent overseas via email. Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il.

Shabbat Shalom is available on our website: www.netivot-shalom.org.il