THE LORD SPOKE TO
MOSHE SAYING: COMMAND THE ISRAELITE PEOPLE AND SAY TO THEM: BE PUNCTILIOUS IN
PRESENTING TO ME AT STATED TIMES THE OFFERINGS OF FOOD DUE ME, AS OFFERINGS BY
FIRE OF PLEASING ODOR TO ME. SAY TO THEM: THESE ARE THE OFFERINGS BY FIRE THAT
YOU ARE TO PRESENT TO THE LORD: AS A REGULAR BURNT OFFERING EVERY DAY, TWO
YEARLING LAMBS WITHOUT BLEMISH. YOU SHALL OFFER ONE LAMB IN THE MORNING, AND
THE OTHER LAMB YOU SHALL OFFER AT TWILIGHT. AND AS A MEAL OFFERING, THERE SHALL
BE A TENTH OF AN EPHAH OF CHOICE FLOUR WITH A QUARTER OF A HIN OF BEATEN OIL
MIXED IN – THE REGULAR BURNT OFFERING INSTITUTED AT MOUNT SINAI – AN OFFERING
BY FIRE OF PLEASING ODOR TO THE LORD.

(B'midbar 28:2-6)

PLEASING ODOR, NACHAT RUACH, THE
WILL OF THE LORD

"A pleasing odor" – Nachat ruach (Nachat Ruach
can be translated as 'satisfaction', 'gratification', 'tranquillity', 'serene
spirit', 'pleasure') – pleasure – for me, for I spoke and my will
was executed.

(Rashi, Bemidbar 28:8)

"Then Noach built an altar to the Lord and, taking of every
clean animal and of every clean bird, he offered burnt offerings on the altar.
The Lord smelled the reyach nichoach [pleasing odor] , and the Lord said
to Himself: Never again will I doom the earth because of man, since the
devisings of man's mind are evil from his youth; nor will I ever again destroy
every living being, as I have done.

 (Bereishit
8:20-21)

'Reyach nichoach' does not mean "pleasant odor" but
rather: the satisfaction of the request and aspirations of the other.

(Rabbi S. R. Hirsch,
Bereishit 8:21)

"What need have I of all your sacrifices? says the Lord. I am
sated with burnt offerings of rams and suet of fatlings, and blood of bulls; I
have no delight in lambs and he-goats. That you come to appear before Me – who
asked that of you? Trample My courts no more; Bringing oblations is futile,
incense is offensive to Me. New moon and Sabbath, proclaiming of solemnities,
assemblies with iniquity, I cannot abide."

(Isaiah 1:11-13)

"What need have I of all your sacrifices" – Said
Rabbi Elazar: Prayer is superior to all offerings, for it is written "What
need have I of all your sacrifices" and it is written, "And
when you lift up your hands… Though you pray at length, I will not listen."
Said Rabbi Yochanan: Any cohen who has killed someone shall not lift his
arms [to bless], as is written, " Your hands are stained with
blood."

 (Yalkut Shimoni, Isaiah 247:387)

Five events occurred to our ancestors on the 17^th of Tammuz
and five on the 9^th of Ab – on the 17^th of Tammuz the
tablets were smashed and the regular tammid offering was cancelled and
the city was invaded and Apostomos burnt the Torah and stood an idol in the
sanctuary.

(Mishna, Taanit 4:1)

THE
HEIGHTS OF AVARIM

Devorah Greniman

"THE LORD SAID TO MOSHE, "ASCEND THESE HEIGHTS OF AVARIM
AND VIEW THE LAND THAT I HAVE GIVEN TO THE ISRAELITE PEOPLE. WHEN YOU HAVE SEEN
IT, YOU TOO SHALL BE GATHERED TO YOUR KIN, JUST AS YOUR BROTHER AHARON WAS.
FOR, IN THE WILDERNESS OF ZIN, WHEN THE COMMUNITY WAS CONTENTIOUS, YOU
DISOBEYED MY COMMAND TO UPHOLD MY SANCTITY IN THEIR SIGHT BY MEANS OF THE
WATER." THOSE ARE THE WATERS OF MERIBATH-KADESH, IN THE WILDERNESS OF ZIN."

(B'midbar 27:12-14)

Moshe would seem to have been the only person
in the Torah to die 'by fiat', by divine command. The formulation in Parashat
Haazinu is even more blunt, almost cruel: "Die on the mountain which you
are ascending" (Devarim 32:50).
True, Moshe is ordered to die "as your brother Aharon died" (as per
the text in "Haazinu"), but Aharon's death, as described in Parashat
Hukkat, is an event which is to occur according to a divine plan; it is not an
act in which Aharon is to play an active role. It seems to me that it is not a
case of suicide, but a revelation of a unique spiritual power, one which
permits a person to determine the moment of his death when his time arrives.
Yet more: Moshe succeeds in this supreme mission which is recorded in detail in
the Midrash, even though he was still fit, as is described in "V'zot
haberacha": "His eyes were undimmed and his vigor unabated." He
succeeded, even though the timing of his demise was not at all to his liking,
as we learn from the opening of the Parashat Va'etchanan:

I pleaded with the Lord at that time,
saying, "O Lord God, You who let Your servant see the first works of Your
greatness and Your mighty hand, You whose powerful deeds no god in heaven or on
earth can equal! Let me, I pray, cross over and see the good land on the other
side of the Jordan, that good hill country, and the Lebanon." But the Lord
was wrathful with me on your account and would not listen to me. The Lord said
to me, "Enough! Never speak to Me of this matter again. Go up to the
summit of Pisgah and gaze about, to the west, the north, the south, and the
east. Look at it well, for you shall not go across yonder Jordan. (Devarim 3;23-27)

I note a paradox: The site which is chosen
for Moshe's expiration, the Height of Avarim, – the Heights of Passages – is
the "Do not pass here!" point for Moshe! It is called by this name
expressly for Moshe; for it has another name, Mt. Nevo, which is familiar to
other inhabitants of the region and to those who read the narrative until this
day. Why does it receive another name at this crucial time, when Moshe is about
to depart this world, and the Children of Israel are about to inherit their
land?

Ramban, explaining our parasha, is of the
opinion that the site was called Har HaAvarim "because it was above
the passages over the Jordan ("maabarot haYarden),
leading into the Land of Canaan". From this it follows that it was called
by this name because it was the place where the Ivrim (Hebrews) will
pass into their inheritance. It is also possible to derive two additional
possible reasons from the immediate context in which the name appears in our
parasha: The parasha of the daughters of Tselophehad, on the one hand, and the
appointment of Yehosha to be the new national leader, on the other. This
mountain serves as a point of passage from many aspects: this is the place
where the passage of patrimonies in the Land of Israel from generation to
generation to the sons of Israel and to its daughters is arranged; so is the
passage of authority and leadership of Israel from Moshe to Yehoshua organized;
not to speak of the passage of Moshe himself from this world onto the next.

Incidentally, in Parashat "Va'etchanan"
there is a description of Moshe's flinching from his death before passing over
into the promised land; here we are witness to his disquietude at transfer of
authority. "May God appoint… a man over the congregation",
he pleads, "and let not the congregation of the Lord be as sheep
without a shepherd." It appears that he fears a situation in which a
replacement for him, in his image, may not be found; he does not see a suitable
candidate for the task. However, what is needed at this point of passage is not
a clone of Moshe, but a strong and loyal military leader. "Take
Yehoshua", answers God – and Yehoshua is none other than the person
closest to him! It was difficult for Moshe to give up the image of the
prophet/leader who led his flock in the desert, and therefore he could not see
that the very person who served him so devotedly is destined to be the new
leader.

The Netziv, author of "Haamek Davar",
suggests an additional explanation for the nomenclature of the mountain in his
explication of Parashat Haazinu:

It has two sides (avarim). The
eastern slope belonged to Moav, and the western slope belonged to the patrimony
of the sons of Gad. Clarification continues: "which is in the land of
Moav", the eastern side still belongs to the land of Moav; "which
faces Jericho", this is the western side, and belongs to Israel. God
mentions all this because the two sides of the of the mountain were
differentiated in the matter of Moshe's ascent to his demise, as is clarified: "And
see the Land of Canaan, etc." – there, on the side facing Jericho,
stand and behold. "You shall die on the mountain you are about to
ascend" – on that mountain – but not at that same location and
side from which you view [the land of Canaan], but on the other side, that of
the land of Moav.

In other words, the
significance of the mountain's two sides for Moshe is that he must die on the
desert side, that side which is – from his point of view – the undesirable one.
He must move from one slope to the other in other to follow the order. But, as
is stressed by the author of the "Hizkuni" commentary on Va'etchanan,
Moshe belongs to the generation condemned to die in the desert. This provides
yet another explanation for both the rejection of Moshe's plea to cross over
into the promised land together with the new generation, and for the
appellation given the mountain:

But the Lord was wrathful with me on
your account – Said The Holy One, Blessed Be He, to Moshe: If you cross
over into the land, they will say: The reason for the decree that the
generation of the desert not enter the Land, is because they have no portion in
the world to come; but if you enter by virtue of your prayer, they will say:
Moshe worries only about himself. Therefore, you will be buried with them, and
you shall bring the nation in the future,
as is written, "He approached with the heads of the people."

This is to say that the reason for God's
wrath which prevented Moshe from crossing over was God's compassion for the
generation of the desert; had he been permitted to cross, Moshe would have
abandoned them. Perhaps there was yet another basis for God's anger: God
himself does not mention the reason suggested by the Hizkuni as a factor in His
denying passage of Moshe into Eretz Yisrael. On three occasions – the parasha
of Mei-merivah itself, in our parasha, and in "Va'etchanan" – He
emphasizes that the cause is none other than Moshe's failure, his refrain from
performing an act of Kiddush Hashem – Sanctification of the Name – as he was
asked to do at Mei-merivah. It is as though The Holy One, Blessed Be He, had
said to Moshe: "The problem is not external; it is internal, in your
behavior." As Rashi explains in his commentary to Parashat Hukkat, the
extraction of water from the rock should have been an educational matter, a
lesson in God's power and His willingness to perform miracles for the Israelite
nation. It was not supposed to emulate magic performed by flesh and blood, even
if the flesh and blood belonged to Moshe our teacher and Aharon the priest. The
educational failure caused spiritual damage which even Moshe could not fully
rectify. Therefore, as with cases in which God's forgiving the people did not prevent
their punishment, so Moshe's stature as a prophet – and Aharon's greatness as a
priest – could not rescue them from the consequences of their action, despite
God's love for them. Consequently, Moshe was forced to cease his entreaties, to
refrain from crossing. Instead he is instructed to transfer his authority to
Yehoshua at the foot of the mountain.

But
let us not forget that the mountain had two names. The Height of Avarim – a
name which reminds us of the past (Avar), all the passages of the Israelite nation
until that day, prior to their passage into Eretz Yisrael; passages which were
transcribed by Moshe into this Book of the Torah and were part of Moshe's
remembered past, even though he had grown up in an Egyptian household, without
ever having heard the tales of the Patriarchs on his parents' knees. But the
second name, mentioned in "Va'etchanan and "V'zot Haberacha", Mt.
Nevo reminds us of that which is yet to come: that future which he
anticipated for the people, and which Moshe himself experienced in his visions
and in his last prophecies. There, from his high vantage point on the mountain,
he is privileged to view the land of the future in all its beauty and glory.
The Height of Avarim, which is Mt. Nevo, is the point of passage between
past and future.

As I
read of Moshe's death, I am reminded of the death of our father Avraham, "old and contented". Moshe was old, but after all his
contentions with God which blocked his passage into the land towards which he
had led the people for 40 years, was he content? On the one hand, he
takes on a tragic aspect, like a very human person who, at life's end, suffers
great disappointment as a result of his actions. On the other hand, when he
climbs Mt. Nevo and sees with his own eyes the breathtaking land of the future
– and dies "with a kiss", "by the mouth of the Lord", before being forced to experience with the people the wars of conquest
and the shameful acts which accompany them – perhaps with this final gift of
grace he achieves contentment? This question must remain unanswered;
perhaps both answers are correct, like the two slopes of the mountain.

Devorah
Greineman edits the magazine "Nashim" for the Study of Women and
Gender in Judaism. She edits for the National Academy of Sciences and engages
in translation and writing

"A NEW
VESSEL FULL OF OLD WINE" AND GREAT HOPE

Upon the publication of Prof. Uriel Simon's
new book "Seek Peace and Pursue It" (Sifrei Hemed – Published by
Yedioth Acharonot – "Judaism Here and Now" series, edited by Yochi
Brandes)

As
this is being written, the Week of the Hebrew Book is being celebrated –
although on a small scale and under heavy security. Some stores extended the
event to a full month. The more poetic name is: The Festival of the Hebrew
Book. It can be said without hesitation that the existence of
well-publicized event based on the appearance of new books in a time when the "sword"
rules in our region, is a cause for special joy and infuses hope in our hearts.
If this be the case with regard to any book which is published these days, how
much more so with regard to Prof. Uriel Simon's new book, which promises
refreshing and challenging readings in the Book of Books.

The
book's preface was published as a monograph in the "Yeriot" series in
memory of Yitzchak Hess in 5759 (a review of this wonderful pamphlet appeared
in "Shabbat Shalom", Issue 75). In this article, Prof. Simon coined
the term "existential pshat"
as an alternative for once again
making the Bible a culturally relevant basis for Israeli society.

Prof.
Simon echoes a statement often made by his late father, Prof. Ernest Simon, z"l,
who complained that "With the people with whom he prays, he cannot talk;
and the people with whom he talks, do not pray". Prof. Simon points out
the difficulty prevalent in Israeli society regarding the Bible: a great
percentage – if not the majority – of the religious community does not believe
in compromise as a basis for resolution of the conflict, and finds Biblical
support for their combative world outlook. Most of the secular community hopes
to settle the territorial and political conflict peacefully, but concurs with
the religious public regarding the martial and nationalistic character of the
Bible; therefore it is to a great degree alienated from it, not considering it
a cultural possession relevant to the shaping of its spiritual and conceptual
world.

Uriel
Simon, pursuer of peace and a man of faith, feels the pain of the Bible and the
pain of divided Israeli society and attempts in his volume to suggest new
insights into the Bible.

At
an evening in honor of the book's publication which was held in Israel Academy
of Sciences, Yochi Brandes, editor of the series, presented – through the
prophet Jeremiah – the problematics of a prophet who has lost the connection
with his people. She emphasized the importance of examining the need for
finding a common language with the public who is willing to create a dialogue
with him. The discussion illustrated the problematics with which Uriel Simon
tries to cope in his book.

Rabbi
She'ar Yashuv Cohen, Chief Rabbi of Haifa – while heaping praises upon the book
– denies (without reference to the book itself) the author's portrayal of the
religious public. He sees the Religious-National community, from the Beth
Midrash of Rabbi Kook, as a community which seeks peace no less than others,
and therefore disputes the problematics which engendered the book. In contrast
to Rabbi Cohen, Prof. Yaira Amit confirms Uriel Simon's claim regarding the way
which the secular Israeli reads the Bible – even if he be a Bibliophile.

Prof.
Moshe Halbertal accurately defined the root of the controversy between the
community which sees peace and morality as religious value, without connection
to this or that political reality, and the community which considers the
wholeness of the Land to be a supreme or exclusive religious value. Both in his
book and in the evening's discussion, Uriel Simon examines the complex Israeli
reality as a believer, by means of the Bible and tradition. For Uriel Simon, "there
can be no religious position which not moral; it is unthinkable that the
temple be built "with blood and fire"; the Biblical paradigm of King
David who is not permitted to built the temple because: "Much blood have you shed, and many wars have
you waged. You shall not erect a house to my name, for much blood have you
spilled on the land before me" has
become very real. Uriel Simon's greatness lies in his transformation of the
Biblical narrative into a relevant Torah of life and in presenting an
alternative spiritual challenge to messianic, combative religious Zionism.

Pinchas Leiser
-editor

Editorial Board: Pinchas Leiser (Editor),
Miriam Fine (Coordinator), Itzhak Frankenthal and Dr. Menachem Klein

Translation: Kadish Goldberg

This weekly publication was made possible by:

The Moriah Fund, the Tisch Foundation and private donors

To our readers:

We will be happy to have you actively participate in "Shabbat
Shalom" by:

·     
Letters to the editor

·     
Publication of Divrei Torah (in coordination with the
editorial board)

For details, contact Miriam Fine (053-920206 or 02-6730196)

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards
its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel $1000
• English edition distributed via email $ 100

Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc.
Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in
advance to appear in the English email.

US, Canadia or British tax-exempt contributions to OzveShalom may be
made through the New Israel Fund or through P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc.

Contributions should be marked as donor-advised to OzveShalom/Netivot
Shalom, the Shabbat Shalom project.

New Israel Fund, POB
53410, Jerusalem 91534 (Please include Israeli address and telephone number)

New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New Israel Fund of Canada, 801 Eglinton Ave. West, Suite #401, Toronto,
Ontario M5N 1E3 Canada (Canadian tax exemption)

New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street, London W1H 2DD,
United Kingdom (British tax exemption)

P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite 607, New
York, New York 10017 USA

About us:

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of
a civil society in Israel. It is committed to promoting the ideals of
tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts which have always been central to
Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of
Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value. It believes
that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to support the
pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a
fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an
option but an imperative.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's programs include both educational and
protest activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences and weekend
programs are held for students, educators and families, as well as joint
seminars for Jews, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities focus on
issues of human rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and responses to
issues of particular religious relevance.

9,000 copies of a 4 page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah
reading are written and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are
distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email.
Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's educational forums draw people of different
backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to deepen their Jewish
knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint on the subjects of
peace and social issues.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom fills an ideological
vacuum in Israel's society. Committed both to Jewish tradition and observance,
and to the furthering of peace and coexistence, the movement is in a unique
position to engage in dialogue with the secular left and the religious right,
with Israeli Arabs and with Palestinians.

Our activities are funded by donations and one
part time employee.

OzveShalom/Netivot Shalom                Tel./Fax
972-2-5664218

Pob 4433                                             Email:
ozshalom@netvision.net.il

Jerusalem 94310, Israel                        www.
netivot-shalom.org