AND A LATER GENERATION, YOUR DESCENDANTS, WHO WILL RISE AFTER YOU, ALONG WITH THE

FOREIGNER WHO COMES FROM A DISTANT LAND, WILL SAY, UPON SEEING THE PLAGUES OF

THAT LAND AND THE DISEASES WITH WHICH THE LORD STRUCK IT: SULFUR

AND SALT HAVE BURNED UP ITS ENTIRE LAND! IT CANNOT BE SOWN, NOR CAN IT GROW

OVERTURNING OF SODOM, GEMORRAH, ADMAH AND ZEBOIIM, WHICH THE LORD OVERTURNED IN

HIS FURY AND IN HIS RAGE. AND ALL THE NATIONS WILL SAY, "WHY DID THE LORD

DO SO TO THIS LAND? WHAT [IS THE REASON] FOR THIS GREAT RAGE

OF FURY?"

(Devarim 29:21-23)

R. Yehudah

son of R. Ila'i said: The Land of Israel burned for

seven years with sulfur and fire, for it is said: Sulfur and salt have

burned up its entire land! In those seven years, God has already collected

live in the Messianic Age. What saved them from the punishment of Gehinom? Burial in the Land of Israel, for it is said: and

His land shall atone for His people.

(Yalkut Shimoni Tehillim 847)

…the main point is in

accordance with RaShBA's interpretation of the verse,

that if the blessed Lord gave [them] the land in order that they uphold His

covenant then, if they transgress it the gift is void. Since the covenant is

void, so is the gift of the land. That is [what they meant when] they said that

when He took them out of Egypt, he established a covenant with them but they

could claim they had been forced ("He held the mountain over them like a

basin") and so the gift is void. That is why He poured His wrath and anger

upon the land alone – unlike the case of Sodom and Gomorrah where the

land's inhabitants were destroyed. Rather, He sent them to another land

so that they would wander and sojourn in strange lands to this very day; that

He had taken them out of Egypt and did not destroy them. Therefore, when they

repent in all the nations, etc. (Devarim 30:1) as when they accepted [the Torah] in the

days of Ahasuerus, then He will return and collect

them from all the peoples (30:3) when it [their acceptance of he Torah] will be with all your heart

(30:2) – without any duress.

(R.

Meir Simha MiDvinsk, Meshekh Hokhma 29:23-24)

You are all standing this day

Gili Zivan

All

woodcutters and your water drawers. That you may enter the covenant of the Lord, your

God, and His oath, which the Lord, your God, is making with you this day. In

order to establish you this day as His people, and that He will be your God, as

He spoke to you, and as He swore to your forefathers to Abraham, to Isaac, and

to Jaco. But not only with you am I making this

Lord, our God, and [also] with those who are not here with us, this day. (Devarim

29,9-14)

Parashat Nitzavim opens with two insights concerning the essence of

human society, or, if you please, they concern two possible ways of looking at

a nation's essence.

The

first point of view is horizontal. It emphasizes the reciprocal

solidarity between the tribal elder and the woodcutter, between the Supreme

Court justice and the fruit-seller at work in his market stall. Therefore, in

order for a nation to enter God's covenant it must create this feeling of

togetherness. The nation's "all of you" must genuinely include

everyone.

The

second viewpoint is vertical. A human society that seeks continuity and

vitality includes in itself not merely those who are present; it also includes

the heritage of those who are absent, of those who are no longer with us

today in the physical sense, but whose insights, whose loves and hatreds, whose

struggles, both successful and failed, all shaped us to make us who we are. In

the same way our values, deeds, and words will – if we like it or not – affect

the coming generations with whom the covenant has already been made in potentia.

This

Shabbat, the eve of Rosh HaShana

5768, I will endeavor to broaden the scope of thought regarding the role of

both these viewpoints for the maintenance of a living and vibrant society, a

society that is capable of committing itself to the covenant and to being His

people.

The

horizontal viewpoint is found in the life of the community, in our ability to be concerned for the

suffering of the "other" in our community. It is expressed in dozens

of halakhot devoted to arranging decent

relations between people. The horizontal viewpoint is expressed in the "we"

feeling, a feeling which, unfortunately, is constantly being drained out of the

increasingly segmented Israeli experience. It calls for the responsibility of

every societal group not only for its own "sector" but also for the

other parts of the Jewish People, including the "strangers" who live

among us (foreign workers, minorities, and all those alluded to by the verse, and

your stranger who is within your camp).

If

we observe the transitional moments in our lives we will find that they always

occur in a public context and that individuals can maintain a Jewish way of

life only as members of the community.

Prof.

David Hartman expressed this well:

As

someone included in the covenant… the Jewish individual is clearly placed

within the community's framework. The covenant was made with the people in its

entirety and not with Jews as individuals. The broad scope in which the

individual finds spiritual self-fulfillment cannot exist in isolation from

political, collective consciousness. (David Hartman, MiSinai

leTzion, pg. 16)

It

is not only commandments such as charity, tithes, gifts to the poor and

exchange of food parcels on Purim, rituals of joy and mourning, and weekday,

Sabbath, and festival prayers that cannot be performed without a community. Rather,

the very meaning of "being a Jew" means, among other things,

consciousness of one's being part of a people. As Hartman puts it, "The

Jew can stand at the foot of Mount Sinai only after he becomes "we" (Hartman, Be'Ayin Tova, pg.

128). And "we"

means the community both in the past as well as in the present.

In

an interview with the editors of the book She'eilot

al Elohim ["Questions Concerning God"

Yizhar Hess and Elazar Shtrum, editors], Hartman describes the foundations of his

religious faith:

I

was brought up in a religious home, in a yeshiva framework and within a

community of people whose very lives gave witness to God's existence. Their

very lives were testimony… I am of the opinion

that you do not begin with ze Eli ve'anveihu [this is my God, and I will make Him a

habitation] but rather with Elohei avi ve'aramemeihu [the God

of my father, and I will ascribe to Him exaltation]. That is to say that

gives testimony to the worship of God. And so, I did not find God in a

particular place on a particular day in a particular corner, or in some

personal mystical experience, but rather within the framework of communal life…

I

have no scientific proof of this [the existence God] or a personal experience

that affirms God's existence. Spiritual life is built on prayers, Shabbat, and

Torah study. This whole framework gives testimony and is significant to me.

This life marks for me the existence of God. (op. cit. pg. 13,

boldface added)

The "community which built its life upon the awareness that there is

something beyond man" (ibid.) expresses this awareness through its way of

life, which is embodied in concrete commandments. The way of life of the Jewish

community serves as witness to its faith in the existence of God (which cannot

be proven scientifically).

Therefore, Hartman claims that "if you want to rehabilitate

religious experience based upon commandments… you must first rehabilitate

communal feeling… .Jewish education fails today

because it is cold and insulated. There is no echoing voice "there"

to make one feel: "I belong to something greater than myself and my

private family" (Hartman in Ayin Tova, pp. 128-9).

Yeshayahu Leibowitz also testified to the role of the

community of believers in fashioning Jewish belief:

I

have a portion in Torah and faith only to the degree that I belong to

collective Israel. I myself lack the drive and the strength to create a new

religion and faith of my own. This religious collective was not created by

elements of faith or by values, since consciousness and volition are

essentially personal, private, subjective, and individual. There is no such

thing as volitional or conceptual collectivities, but a common way of life is

possible. (Yeshayahu Leibowitz, Yahadut, Am Yisrael ve'Medinat Yisrael pg. 20)

Each person's faith choice is personal, but the way of life is created by

the community, by the collectivity known as the People Israel from its

beginning and up to its present modes of expression.

"Collective Israel" a lá Leibowitz is supra-historical and it leads us to the

vertical perspective, which crosses boundaries of time and place.

The horizontal perspective expresses our way of looking at reality, our

and mothers. That is to say, the

individual is not only part of the living community; he is also part of an

entire culture of traditions and customs into which he was born and in which

his own creations take shape. At the conclusion of his book HaMasa

HaYehudi-Yisraeli, Prof. Avi

Sagi analyzes the Jew's identification with the

Jewish collectivity spanning the generations. In order to clarify his argument

he cites the case of Brother Daniel (Daniel Oswald Rufeisen)

and Judge Zilberg's ruling, which "penetrated

the meaning of Jewish identity" (pg. 242). Brother Daniel was born a Jew and in the Second World War he risked his

life to save his brothers. Later, he converted and became a Christian Monk. After

the war he immigrated to Israel as a Christian monk and asked to be recognized

as a Jew. Judge Zilberg was aware of the fact that halakhically speaking Brother Daniel was a Jew. However, halakhic identity is not sufficient. Judge Zilberg emphasized that in order to be counted as a Jew

Brother Daniel had to be part of the Jewish discourse spanning generations.

…one thing is shared in common by all of the

People [Israel] dwelling in Zion (except for a tiny minority): we do not

disengage ourselves from the historical past and we do not deny our heritage. The

lines of connection differ, the conclusions differ, but we do not stop up the

wells… such and such are the national burden of the Jew in Israel – whether

he is religious, non-religious, or anti-religious, if he likes it or not he is

connected by his umbilical cord to Jewish history: from it he draws his

language and its expressions…

Sagi explains that, "Judge Zilberg's main

claim is that a Jew's Jewish identity depends upon his entry to Judaism's diachronic discourse. Failing to make that entry a person can subjectively identify with the

Jewish collectivity, but he will not be identified as a Jew; that is to say – that

will not make him into a member of the collectivity" (Sagi

pg. 244 boldface added).

It winds up that we are in need of the diachronic discourse (the

inter-generational discourse expressed by the vertical line) as well as of the

synchronic discourse (the discourse of the present community). In order to enter

the Lord's covenant we must cast our eyes empathetically towards

out bothers and sisters while also looking towards the present and future with

the knowledge that our existence and present mindset are rooted in our Jewish

heritage.

I gaze upon Israeli society on the eve of Rosh HaShana 5768 and I do not know which discourse we are

more in need of. If synchronic

discourse is the discourse of concern for the "other," then we have a

long way to go to become a "we." "We" – according to the

opening verses of our parasha – include both those

above and those below the poverty line, both our brothers, members of the

Jewish People as well as the "non-Jews" who live in our midst. It

appears that if we do not hasten to change our modes of thought and action Israeli

society will not endure.

If we glance for a moment towards the diachronic discourse as a necessary

element in Jewish identity, we see here too that many parts of Israeli society

have disengaged from discourse with the sources of our culture, and we must act

in every way possible to revive that discourse, be it through pluralistic batei midrashot,

through the expansion of cultural and media events dealing with past Jewish

materials and their meaning for us, and in every creative way that will join

more Jews to such a living discourse.

Dr. Gili Zivan directs the Yaakov Hertzog Center for Jewish Studies in Kibbutz Ein Tzurim

Righteousness and Justice Are the Base of Your Throne, Steadfast

Love and Faithfulness Stand before You

(Psalms 89:15, Slihot service)

The story is told of King Mumbaz who spent all

of his treasures in years of famine. His brothers told him: Your fathers hid

treasures and increased those of their fathers, whereas you wasted all your

treasures and those of your fathers.

He replied: My fathers hid treasures below, I hid them above, as is

written Truth springs up from the earth; my fathers hid treasures in a

place under human control, but I hid treasures in places not under man's

control, as is written Righteous

and justice are the base of Your throne; my fathers hid treasures which bear no fruit, but I hid treasures which

bear fruit, as is written, Hail the just man for he shall fare well, he

shall eat the fruit of his works; my fathers hid treasures of money, but I

hid treasures of souls, as is written, The fruit of the righteous

is a tree of life; a wise man captivates people; my fathers hid

treasures for others, but I hid them for myself, as is written, And it will

be to your merit before the Lord your God; my fathers hid treasures in this

world, but I hid them in the world to come, as is written, Your

righteousness shall go before you.

(Tosefta

Pe'a, 4:18)

It is known that Justice is

the base of the throne of glory, as

is written: Righteousness and

justice are the base of Your throne, and whoever establishes justice, establishes

the throne. And whoever casts aside petitions for judgment or blemishes it,

blemishes the throne, and therefore Scripture reminds us that one who is not

good will not merit the good mentioned in Psalm 31, How

abundant is the good that You have in store for those who fear You. With this, Solomon teaches us that whoever

shows favoritism in judgment is punished both in this world and in the next.

Justice is the reason for peace, and therefore we find that Yitro,

in his advice he gave Moses regarding judgment, mentions peace, as is written: If you do thus in this matter when God

to its place in peace. The world exists because of peace. Therefore,

judgment was assigned to the Sages, for the Sages increase peace in

the world.

(Rabbeinu Behayey, Shemot 20:22)

The Shemitah

Year is Meant to Bring Peace and Equality

This is also the rationale for this [commandment of] hakhel

the first day of the festival, God commanded us to make another similar gesture

every seven years, for the Shemitah year also

gives rise to solidarity and peace. This occurs because one does not sew seed

and grow [crops] and the poor can eat [whatever grows by itself],

for one is prohibited from acting as the landowner and taking hold of the

seventh year's grain. All of this doubtlessly causes peace, since all conflicts

derive from the trait of "mine is mine," i.e., "it is all

mine." All of this is less evident in the seventh year, because while

action [i.e. agricultural production] involves inequality, all are equal in inaction,

and that is really what peace is about. And so in the Sukkot

Festival every one leaves his permanent dwelling for a temporary dwelling and

sits under the sukka of His peace. On the

first day of hol ha'moed

the king is commanded to create a feeling of peace. That is the point of hakhel, for all of this is preparation for

repentance and he [the king] reads stirring words of rebuke to them from Devarim.

(Keli

Yakar Devarim 31:12)

Readers Respond

In David Yiselzohn's article, "Stages

of Faith" (Shabbat Shalom parashat Ekev), there is an apparent slide from the concept of yira ["fear"] and yirat

Hashem ["fear of God"] to the concept

of emuna ["belief" or "faith"].

The author quotes a verse from the parasha referring

to fear of the Lord and immediately interprets it as referring to emuna – without giving his readers any explanation

of the basis for this move.

True, both concepts are important for Judaism, but the differences

between them are clear. Emuna relates to the epistemic

realm, to the acceptance of particular utterances or opinions. Yira refers to a certain relation towards God, to

what might be called a certain attitude of the soul.

The RaMBaM makes this distinction salient in

his writings. Ha'amanat ha'elohut

his Sefer HaMitzvot,

while ha'amanat yirato

as the fourth commandment. Similarly, the first chapter of Hilkhot

Yesodei HaTorah is

devoted to delineating emuna in the Creator,

in His existence and unity, while the beginning of the second chapter treats

the proper love and fear of God.

Actually, I think that this emphasis on emuna

in its cognitive sense is an invention of the RaMBaM

and others of his period. Both Scripture and the Sages do not trouble

themselves much with emuna as a concept. The

famous verse referring to Abraham, And he

accounted to him as righteousness (Bereishit 15:6) is talking about Abraham's

faithfulness [ne’emanut] rather than to his

faith [emuna]. The Mishnah

and Gemara hardly set down any rulings regarding

matter of emuna, save those found in the

famous mishnah from Perek

Helek: "These have no portion in the World

to Come: one who says there will be no resurrection of the dead, or that the

Torah is not from Heaven, etc."

In conclusion, a quick comment: It is my impression that of late many

people – even those from the innermost circles of Modern Orthodoxy – avoid

mentioning the concept of yira, preferring

instead to speak almost exclusively about ahava

reaction to the overemphasis of fear and punishment in certain sectors of

religious education. However, exclusive emphasis on love without fear is

unbalanced and even dangerous, but this is not the place to expand on that

issue.

Rabbi Yehonatan Chipman,

Jerusalem

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards

its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel

  $700

• English edition distributed via email $

  100

Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc. Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to

appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in advance to appear in the English email.

In Israel, checks made out

to Oz VeShalom may be sent to Oz VeShalom-P.O.B.

4433, Jerusalem 91043. Unfortunately there is no Israeli tax-exemption for

local donations.

US and British tax-exempt contributions to Oz VeShalom may be made through:

New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford

Street, London W1H 2DD, Great Britain

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW ISRAEL FUND IS NO LONGER ACCEPTING DONATIONS

UNDER $100.

PEF will also channel donations and provide a tax-exemption. Donations

should be sent to P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave.,

Suite 607, New York, New York 10017 USA

All contributions should be marked as donor-advised to Oz ve'Shalom, the Shabbat Shalom project.

About us

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement

dedicated to the advancement of a civil society in Israel. It is committed to

promoting the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts that have

always been central to Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep

attachment to the land of Israel and it no less views peace as a central

religious value. It believes that Jews have both the religious and the national

obligation to support the pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law

clearly requires us to create a fair and just society, and that co-existence

between Jews and Arabs is not an option but an imperative.

5,000 copies of a

4-page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are written and

published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are

distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email.

Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il.