THE

LORD SAID TO MOSHE: SPEAK TO THE PRIESTS,

THE

SONS OF AHARON, AND SAY TO THEM:

NONE

SHALL DEFILE HIMSELF FOR ANY DEAD PERSON AMONG HIS KIN…

THE

LORD SPOKE TO MOSHE, SAYING:

INSTRUCT

AHARON AND HIS SONS…

IF

A MAN TOUCHES ANY SWARMING THING

BY

WHICH HE IS MADE UNCLEAN

OR

ANY HUMAN BEING BY WHOM HE IS MADE UNCLEAN –

WHATEVER

HIS UNCLEANLINESS – THE PERSON WHO TOUCHES SUCH

SHALL

BE UNCLEAN UNTIL EVENING

AND

SHALL NOT EAT OF THE SACRED DONATIONS

UNLESS

HE HAS WASHED HIS BODY IN WATER.

AS

SOON AS THE SUN SETS HE SHALL BE CLEAN;

AND

AFTERWARDS HE MAY EAT OF THE SACRED DONATIONS,

FOR

THEY ARE HIS FOOD.

(Vayikra 21-22)

Our Is A Torah Of Life

Antique and modern heathenism like so

very much to associate religion and religious matters with death and thought of

death. For them is where Man ends that the Kingdom of God begins. For them

death and dying are the real manifestations of their godhead, who to them is a

god of death and not of life. A god who kills and does not animate, and sends

death ands forerunners, illness and wretchedness, so that men should fear him,

realize his power and their impotence. The places which they dedicate to

temples are therefore round about graves, the foremost place of their priest is

there at the dead…

Not so is the Jewish priest because not

so is the Jewish teaching of God, the Jewish religion. The God, Whose Name

assigns the Jewish priest to his office is a God of life. His most sublime

manifestation is the elevating power of Life, freeing, animating, raising Man

to free will and to eternal life, not the crushing power of death. Not how one

is to die, but how one is to live, how, living, one has victoriously to conquer

death, death in life, how he will overcome thralldom, enslaved by one's

physical urges, moral weakness…

When Death summons the people to come to

busy themselves in acts of love with the empty body of nefesh, a soul

which God has called home, the Kohanim have to remain away, and by standing

away to keep aloft the Standard of Life next to the corpse, and by the thoughts

of what life really is prevent the thoughts of death overpowering the truths

that the real Man himself is morally free and not subject to forces which kill

his power over his own moral free will… they shall strengthen in

their hearts the idea of Life, lest they be conquered by the idea of Death.

(From Rabbi S. R. Hirsch's commentary on

Vayikra 21:5. Translated from the original by Yitzchak Halevi)

ON HASTE, DELIBERATION, AND HUMILITY

Avigdor Shinan

Among

the subjects comprising Parashat Emor we find the short story about the

blasphemer (Vayikra 24: 10-23).

The

story has a clear four-part structure: [A] Description of the event: "There

pronounced the Name in blasphemy, and he was brought to Moshe…" [B]

The offender's incarceration until issuance of the divine sentence: "… and

to them." [C] The sentence: "And the Lord spoke to

community stone him." [D] Execution of the sentence: "…

and they took the blasphemer outside the camp and pelted him with stones.

The Israelites did as the Lord had commanded Moshe."

A

similar structure is be found in three other Biblical narratives: The Pesach Sheini

(Jews

unable to bring the Pesach offering at the appointed time because of distance

or ritual impurity were obligated to bring it a month later, on Pesach Sheini –

the Second Pesach.) story

(Bemidbar 15:6-14), the story of the wood-gatherer (Ibid. 15:32-36), and the

story the daughters of Zelophehad (Bemidbar 27:1-11; ibid. 36:1-22). In all

these cases, Moshe was unable to resolve the problem which arose, and waited

for resolution from above: "And Moshe said to them: Stand, and I shall

hear what the Lord commands you", "and he was placed in

custody until the decision of the Lord shall be made clear to you",

"And Moshe brought their case before the Lord" After

the appropriate instruction was received from the Lord, it was carried out and

then instituted as law for all generations.

Chazal,

detecting the similarity between the four stories, exploited it in order to

teach new ideas. Thus, for example, it was established that the anonymous

wood-gatherer was none other than Zelophehad (Bavli, Shabbat

91b), and that the

difference between the punishment meted out to the blasphemer ("Let the

community pelt him with stone") and that given the wood-gatherer

("And they pelted him with stones") comes to teach us the two-stage

process of stoning: "The stoning house was the height of two [men], one of

the witnesses pushes him] at his hips… if this [fall] kills him, the

obligation has been fulfilled, and if not, the second witness takes the stone a

places it upon his heart. If he dies, the obligation has been fulfilled, and if

not, he is stoned by all Israel… thus fulfilling "pelted him with

stones" and "pelt him with stone"

(Sifri, Bemidbar 114).

The Midrash further determines that the story of the blasphemer and the story of the wood

gatherer occurred

concurrently: "And they brought him [the blasphemer] to Moshe'

– but they did not bring the wood-gatherer with him… "and they

placed him custody' – they did not place the wood-gatherer with him,

and both occurred at the same time" (Sifra, Emor 14). Another tradition has both the

blasphemer and the wood-gatherer confessing their sins – "they lost this

world" but "they inherited the life of the world to come" (Avot

d'Rabbi Natan, Version B, 45). The

basis for this tradition lies in the assertion that the wood-gatherer,

Zelophehad, did what he did in order to publicize the laws of the Shabbat; his

intention was pure, but his action was improper. Therefore he was punished only

in this world. The similarity of this story to that of the blasphemer led –

surprisingly enough – to the transfer of the basis of the former story to that

of the latter. And, finally, the Talmud Bavli (Kritut 7b), connects the Pesach Sheni narrative to

that of the blasphemer in order to teach us that, as a rule, blasphemers are to

be punished by the divinely-meted punishment of karet – as are violators

of the Pesach Sheni commandment – and not by stoning – as was the blasphemer of

our parasha. Only karet. Many additional examples of linkages

which various sources create between stories – primarily by transferring motifs

from story to story – have been found.

At least once, Chazalic

literature deals with these four separate stories as a single, independent,

group. The following segment appears a number of times in Aramaic translations

of the Torah titled "EretzYisraeliim" [of Eretz

Yisrael], a unit with no parallel:

"This

is one of the four judgments which came before Moshe, and he decreed according

to divine direction. In two of them, Moshe was quick; in two he was cautious.

In all the cases he said, "I have no prior knowledge". In the case of

the unclean who could not perform the Pesach sacrifice and in the case of the

daughters of Zelophehad, Moshe was quick, because these were civil cases, with

monetary ramifications. In the matter of the wood-gatherer who had willfully

desecrated the Shabbat and in the matter of the blasphemer who had harshly

cursed the Holy Name, Moshe was cautious, because theirs were capital cases.

This was in order to teach all future judges to be quick in monetary

discovered. And so they

not be ashamed to say, "We have not heard" – for Moshe, their

teacher, said, "I have not heard", and placed him [the blasphemer] in

custody until he was divinely informed which method of punishment was to be

employed."

This

tradition is found in similar versions in connection to the three other stories

in various Aramaic translations, in the so-called "Jerusalem

Translation", in the translation attributed to Yonathan, and others.

The

four stories examined here together, are divided into two separate groups –

civil laws and capital laws. True, the classification of Pesach Sheni as a

purely monetary issue is somewhat far-fetched, but we can still claim that

there is a monetary dimension involved; after all, it necessary to prepare

another sacrifice which incurs additional expenses. Thus the division of the

four stories into two symmetrical groups is preserved.

The tradition is formulated in many other

traditions in the Aramaic translations of the Torah employing "the

numerical opening model". The discussion is opened by a numerical

determination, which is then detailed. The purpose of the convention, in this

instance, is to provide two morals: (A) Pronouncement of judgment in monetary

cases should not be delayed. On the other hand, verdicts in capital cases

should not be issued in haste. A mistaken monetary verdict can be corrected,

but an executed person cannot be resurrected. Therefore, a verdict should not

be arrived at without thorough investigation of the facts and extensive

deliberation. (B) There is no shame in admission of lack of knowledge. Even

Moshe, teacher of all Israel, was not ashamed to admit lack of knowledge. If

this be the case with the father of all prophets – so much more so for anyone

else!

The

translation tradition, which cannot be accurately dated, extracted these

stories from their historical one-time context, and imbued them with timeless

moral content. And even if the messages would seem to be directed only at those

who sit in judgment, it appears that they are intended for every ear, for every

listener. Their moralizing and didactic characteristics are obvious. It is proper

and appropriate that we continually ask ourselves: Do we, as a society,

"I don't know"?

Prof. Avigdor Shinan lectures on Midrash and Aggadah in the Hebrew

Literature Faculty of the Hebrew University in Yerushalayim.

"As

the Sojourner, So Shall The Native Be"

"You

shall have one standard of judgment " – Equal judgment for all of you.

 (Bavli, Bava Kama 84a)

"As the sojourner,

so shall the native be"" – Just as I demand reparation for the

native, so do I demand reparation for the stranger and his beast.

 (Hizkuni, Vayikra

24:22)

"For

I the Lord am your God." – Lord of both the stranger and the citizen, no preferential

treatment of the affluent over the indigent.

(Seforno, Vayikra 24:22)

"As the sojourner,

so shall the native be" – The alien who comes from a foreign land and who is separated

from his land is termed a ger, related to the word gargir – a

berry – which is separated from the tree. One whose ancestors are from the same

city is called an ezrach – as in (Psalms 37:35) "Well-rooted like a robust native

tree" ("ezrach" = "native tree")

resembling a plant planted year ago. Thus the Torah is saying that justice

should be equal for all.

"For

I the Lord am your God". If you do indeed render justice equally,

then – "I the Lord am your God." From the positive we

infer the negative, for whoever does not apply the same standard in justice

discards his divinity and denies the basic principle. It is well-known that all

beliefs and laws of the nations are commentary on the Torah, and the rules of

the Torah are basic principles of Torah. Ignoring them is a desecration of His

Name. Whoever has it in his power to protest, but does not, desecrates the Name

and exhibits respect for idolaters, and demeans the Instruction of Moshe, and

causes the loss of Jewish money. For the entire world is dependent upon laws

 (Rabeinu Behayey, Vayikra 24:22)

"As

the sojourner, so the native"

It does not say "The

sojourner as the native", for that would imply that the level of the

sojourner is beneath that of the native, for the lesser is dependent upon the

greater. Therefore it says "As the sojourner as the native"

– meaning: The native like the sojourner and the

sojourner as the native. They are equal before the law.

 (Ohr HaHayyim, Vayikra,

24:22)

Why

was the Torah given in the desert? To inform us: Just as the desert

is ownerless, free for all, so the words of Torah are free for whoever wants to

learn. So that no one should say "I am a Son of Torah, and Torah was given

to me and to my fathers, and you and your fathers were not Sons of Torah, but

your fathers were strangers". Therefore it is written (Devarim 33) "An inheritance of the assembly of Yaakov" – whoever

assembles in Yaakov, even

sojourners who engage in Torah study are equal to the High Priest, as is written (Vayikra 18) "Which when a human does them, he

lives by means of them, I am the Lord." – It does not say

'Cohen', 'Levite', and 'Israelite', but rather 'human'. Therefore, "One

instruction, one law shall there be for you" (Bemidbar 15:16)

 (Tanchuma, Vayakhel, 8)

Editorial Board: Pinchas Leiser (Editor),

Miriam Fine (Coordinator), Itzhak Frankenthal and Dr. Menachem Klein

Translation: Kadish Goldberg

This weekly publication was made possible by private donors

To our readers:

We

will be happy to have you actively participate in "Shabbat Shalom"

by:

·     Letters to the

editor

·     Publication of

Divrei Torah (in coordination with the editorial board)

If

you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards its

publication and distribution.

• Hebrew edition distributed in Israel $1000
• English edition distributed via email $ 100

Issues

may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc. Requests must be

made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in advance to appear

in the English email.

US

or British tax-exempt contributions to OzveShalom may be made through the New

Israel Fund or through P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc.

Contributions should be marked as

donor-advised to OzveShalom/Netivot Shalom, the Shabbat Shalom project.

New

Israel Fund, POB 53410, Jerusalem 91534 (Please include Israeli address and

telephone number)

New

Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New

Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street, London W1H 2DD, United Kingdom

(British tax exemption)

P.E.F.

Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite 607, New York, New York

10017 USA

About us:

Oz

Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of a civil

society in Israel. It is committed to promoting the ideals of tolerance,

pluralism, and justice, concepts which have always been central to Jewish

tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of

Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value. It believes

that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to support the

pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a

fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an

option but an imperative.

Oz

Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's programs include both educational and protest

activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences and weekend programs are

held for students, educators and families, as well as joint seminars for Jews,

Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities focus on issues of human

rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and responses to issues of

particular religious relevance.

9,000

copies of a 4 page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are

written and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are distributed to

over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email. Our web site is

www.netivot-shalom.org.il.

Oz

Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's educational forums draw people of different

backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to deepen their Jewish

knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint on the subjects of

peace and social issues.

Oz

Veshalom-Netivot Shalom fills an ideological vacuum in Israel's society.

Committed both to Jewish tradition and observance, and to the furthering of

peace and coexistence, the movement is in a unique position to engage in

dialogue with the secular left and the religious right, with Israeli Arabs and

with Palestinians.

Our activities are funded by donations

and are organized by one part time employee.

OzveShalom/Netivot

Shalom           Tel./Fax

972-2-5664218

Pob

4433                                       Email:

ozshalom@netvision.net.il

Jerusalem

94310, Israel                   www.

netivot-shalom.org.il