Chukat 5762 – Gilayon #243





Shabbat Shalom The weekly parsha commentary – parshat




(link to original page)




Parashat Chukkat


THIS IS THE RITUAL
LAW THAT THE LORD HAS COMMANDED. INSTRUCT THE ISRAELITE PEOPLE TO BRING YOU A
RED COW WITHOUT BLEMISH, IN WHICH THERE IS NO DEFECT ON WHICH NO YOKE HAS BEEN
LAID. YOU SHALL GIVE IT TO EL'AZAR THE PRIEST. IT SHALL BE TAKEN OUTSIDE THE
CAMP AND SLAUGHTERED IN HIS PRESENCE. EL'AZAR THE PRIEST SHALL TAKE SOME OF ITS
BLOOD WITH HIS FINGER AND SPRINKLE IT SEVEN TIMES TOWARD THE FRONT OF THE TENT
OF MEETING. THE COW SHALL BE BURNED IN HIS SIGHT – ITS HIDE, FLESH, AND BLOOD
SHALL BE BURNED, ITS DUNG INCLUDED – AND THE PRIEST SHALL TAKE CEDAR WOOD,
HYSSOP AND CRIMSON STUFF, AND THROW THEM INTO THE FIRE CONSUMING THE COW. THE
PRIEST SHALL WASH HIS GARMENTS AND BATHE HIS BODY IN WATER; AFTER THAT THE
PRIEST MAY REENTER THE CAMP, BUT HE SHALL BE UNCLEAN UNTIL EVENING. HE WHO
PERFORMED THE BURNING SHALL ALSO WASH HIS GARMENTS IN WATER, BATHE HIS BODY IN
WATER, AND BE UNCLEAN UNTIL EVENING.

                                                                                                                                                 (Bemidbar 19:2-8)

 

Respect for the Dead, the
Impurity of the Deceased, and Ritual of the Dead and of Graves

"Or a human bone or a
grave"
– [The
Torah] was more stringent with the impurity [tum'ah] of the human corpse
than with all other forms of tum'ah, making it 'the father of the
fathers of tum'ah'
, in order that people should not – out of love –
frequent their deceased and mourn too much, or so that they not be among those
who inquire of the dead, or consult ghosts, even though it be out of respect to
persons. The Torah was most severe regarding their tum'ah, so that they
not fashion from their skins waterskins and rugs, nor make from their bones
utensils for use, thus dishonoring people. And so said our Sages: "Why is
human skin tamei? So that they not use their parents skins for rugs. And
why are human bones tamei? So that they not make ladles from their
parents' bones – their tum'ah is in proportion to their degree of affection.

(Hizkuni,
Bemidbar 19:16)

 

… It may be said
that if the intent of the Torah was to distance the ritual of the dead from
Israel, then – thanks to all those laws and custom of burial which crystallized
in the Halacha – it was reasonably successful. However, it did not succeed in
eradicating the inquiring of the dead. Three thousand years after the Torah
expressly forbade it, we still find among us the ugly custom of the ritual of
holy burial sites, pilgrimages to worship at them, including idolatrous abominations
attendent to such rituals. This idolatrous ritual seems to derive from hidden
fears people have regarding death and the dead; even the Torah in its strict
war against it has not succeed in uprooting it from the Jewish masses until
this very day.

 (Y. Leibowitz: Seven Years of Discussions on the Parashat
Hashavua, p. 700)

 

 

 

THE POWER OF A WORD

Elisheva Baumgarten

 

In the
current parasha we read of the demise of two of Amram's and Yocheved's children
– Miriam and Aharon; Moshe survives them, to receive the punishment which
determines the time and place of his death, outside the boundaries of Eretz
Yisrael, prior to the entry to the Land. This punishment was decreed after
Miriam's death: "the Children of Israel, all the congregation, came to
the Desert of Tsin, in the first month, the people stayed in Kadesh, and there
Miriam died and was buried. The community was without water, and they joined
against Moshe and Aharon."
(
20:1-2). Immediately
after Miriam's death in the Desert of Tsin and her burial there, the Children
of Israel have to cope with a serious problem – an existential problem – dearth
of water.
Rashi explains that "all forty years they had the well in
Miriam's merit". It follows that immediately after her death they faced an
unfamiliar reality.

Following
the people's appeal to Moshe and Aharon and the receiving of God's
instructions, Moshe and Aharon – the rod in Moshe's hand – move to extract
water from the rock. "Moshe and Aharon assembled the congregation in
front of the rock; and he said to them, "Listen, you rebels, shall we get
water for you out of this rock?" And Moshe raised his hand and struck the
rock twice with his rod. Out came copious water, and the community and their
beasts drank." But the Lord said to Moshe and Aharon, "Because you
did not trust Me enough to affirm My sanctity in the sight of the Israelite
people, therefore you shall not lead this congregation into the land that I
have given them."

The
words of Moshe and Aharon to the Children of Israel are a reproach to the
nation and a demand that they grant Moshe and Aharon the trust due its leaders.
As the Rashbam notes: "When he raised his hand with the rod and smote the
rock twice, he told them angrily, Do you believe that from this rock we shall
draw forth water?"
(Rashbam, 20:10) – from
this we see how anger can lead to undesirable behavior.

This
act of Moshe and Aharon, like other acts of the two brothers and their sister
Miriam in our parasha and elsewhere, teach us the importance and the power of
words.
Miriam is a
fascinating character in the exodus saga. Miriam appears a number of times – it
is she who helps Pharaoh's daughter find a wetnurse for the Jewish infant found
on the banks of the Nile; following the crossing of the Reed Sea, it is Miriam
who leads the women with tambourines and dance. But Miriam is also punished and
isolated from the people when she is afflicted with tzaraat. Miriam's tzaraat
results from words exchanged with Aharon regarding Moshe ("And Miriam
and Aharon spoke about Moshe regarding the Cushite woman which he had taken,
for he had taken a Cushite woman. They said, Has God spoken only of Moshe? Of
us too has He spoken, and God overheard"
(Bemidbar 12:1-2). In our parasha, we can understand the sin of
Moshe and Aharon as a continuation that earlier incident, for just as Miriam
used words in improper fashion, so Moshe and Aharon do not speak appropriately,
and even replace words with force. Moreover, even Aharon's death can be read as
a symbol of the power of words, for Aharon – according to a well-known
tradition – was known to be one who pursued peace and established love between
antagonists and between man and wife.

The
power of words, their ability to harm in certain cases and to rescue in others,
stands out also in the Haftara of Parashat Hukkat – the story of Yiftach, of
Gilead, who waged war against the Ammonites.
In this chapter we can see how Yiftach's use of words leads to tragic
consequences. Yiftach, son of a harlot and a brave warrior, is presented as one
driven from his father's house by his brothers. The story begins with Yiftach
being ostracized, compelled to exile to the land of Tov, to dwell there in the
midst of men of low character. He returns to become a leader in times of
adversity, when his brothers battle the Ammonites and come to ask him to be
their leader in battle. Yiftach agrees to conduct the war, but only after the
Elders of Gilead promise him that if he succeeds, he will be appointed their
leader. Yiftach declares, "And Yiftach said to the Elders of Gilead, If
you appoint me to battle the Ammonites, and the Lord delivers them to me, I am
to be your commander"
(Judges 11:9) From this
first meeting with Yiftach we detect his proclivity to making vows and taking
oaths.

On his
way to war, Yiftach returns to his home, and while at Mitzpeh he vows his
second vow, "If you deliver the Ammonites into my hands, then whatever
comes out of the door of my house to meet me upon my safe return from Ammonites
shall be the Lord's and shall offered by me as a burnt offering"
(Ibid. 30-31). Yiftach is successful in battle. But then
discovers the magnitude of his vow, as his daughter is the first to come out to
greet him, with tambourines and dance. His immediate reaction when he comprehends
the consequence of his hastily uttered words is to cry out and to rend his
garments. Our Sages said:

Four
vowed; three requested improperly, and God answered them properly, one ask
improperly and The Holy One, Blessed Be He, answered him improperly. Eliezer,
servant of Avraham, Caleb, Saul, and Yiftach… Yiftach requested
improperly, and The Holy One, Blessed Be He, answered him improperly.
He
requested improperly, as is written, "And Yiftach made a vow to the
Lord, then whatever comes out of the door etc.".
Said The Holy One,
Blessed Be He, to him: If a camel or an ass or a dog would have come out, would
you have offered it as a burnt offering to me?! What did The Holy One, Blessed
Be He, do to him? He answered him improperly, he arranged that his daughter . .
and he could not nullify his vow."  
(Vayikra
Rabba, Ed. Mordecai Margaliyot, 5743, 37:4)

The
author of the midrash continues and explains that the problem was not only with
the vow of Yiftach, but with the unwillingness of Yiftach and the high priest
(Pinchas) to talk to each other; each insisted that because of his high station
he would not be the one to initiate dialogue. Yiftach could have requested
nullification of his vow, "but Yiftach said: I am king – I will not
go to Pinchas; Pinchas said, I am the high priest, I will not go to a
commoner…
(Ibid.)
In the end, the sacrifice of
Yiftach's daughter was the price paid for the two leaders' obstinate refusal to
meet,
to talk and discuss the vow and its problematic nature. The magnitude
of Yiftach's sacrifice is emphasized by repetition of the passage (not recited
by most congregations in the Haftara), "She was an only child, he
had no other son or daughter."
Yiftach's reaction to his daughter's
coming out of the house is painful: "On seeing her, he rent his clothes
and said, "Alas, daughter! You have brought me low; you have become my
troubler! For I have uttered a vow to the Lord and I cannot retract."
Yiftach
is not prepared to retract his promise, nor is he willing to ask anyone else to
release him from his vow. Yet more, he does not fully comprehend his
responsibility for his action, for in speaking to his daughter, she accuses
her: "You have become my troubler".

The
rest of the story indicates that his action towards his daughter is not
exceptional. He does not hesitate to spill blood in order to keep those words
he uttered or did not utter. According to the Bible, his war with the sons of
Efrayim resulted from their complaint that he did not invite them to
participate in war against Ammon. Yiftach insists that he did call them, but
they refused to come to his assistance. The author of the Yalkut Shimoni
explains that here, too, an attempt at compromise could have calmed the
conflict; he connects the conflict with the sons of Efrayim to the sacrifice of
Yiftach's daughter: "Yiftach of the Gilead vowed an improper vow, to offer
up his daughter on the altar. The sons of Efrayim gathered together to contend
with him. Pinchas should have told them, To cancel his vow you did not come,
you came to quarrel. But he did not protest against the sons of Efrayim, and he
did not cancel Yiftach's vow.
(Yalkut Shimoni on Neviim, Shoftim 11, 247:68). This parasha concludes with the deaths of
Yiftach's daughter and of 42,000 sons of Efrayim.

According
to the Midrash, both Pinchas and Yiftach were punished because they could have
spoken and changed the consequences of the rashly spoken words of Yiftach, but,
out of irrelevant considerations, they chose to have blood spilled rather than
concede their vainglory. Pinchas was punished by losing his holy spirit (as per
I
Chron 9:20 "Pinchas son of El'azar was the chief
officer over them in time past; the Lord was with him"
) whereas Yiftach's
punishment for not having sought a way to cancel his vow – but, instead,
immediately determined that "I have opened my mouth to the Lord, and I
cannot recant",
– is expressed though the short passages appearing at
the end of Chapter 12. Towards the end of his life, Yiftach became a judge who led
Israel for six years. The son of the harlot and brave warrior became an
integral part of his surroundings and led the nation, but on the personal level
he paid a high price – both in his own death and in the sacrifice of his
daughter. According to Chazal, Yiftach was interred in the hills of the Gilead,
for because of the sacrifice of his daughter, he was not buried in one place,
but his organs fell from his body and were buried in different locations
(Vayikra Rabba, ibid.). The fact that Yiftach died childless, after
having lost his one and only child, is further emphasized in the closing
passages of Chapter 12, where three judges who succeeded Yiftach are listed.
The Bible tells us nothing of their accomplishments, but the author found it
important to tell us about one point which differentiated between them and
Yiftach. These judges, in contrast of to Yiftach, had many children; Ivtzan of
Bet Lechem had thirty sons and thirty daughters, and Avdon ben Hillel the
Pirathonite had seventy children.

The different deaths recorded in Parashat
Hukkat and in the Haftara, and the actions of the leaders from Moshe till
Yiftach, teach us the importance of speech, the willingness to meet halfway, to
sometimes forgo pride, to try and reach the necessary compromises and
solutions. The price, as we see from Moshe's being unable to enter the Land,
and from the story of Yiftach and his daughter, is high – not only for enemies
distant persons, but also on the closest personal and family plane.

Dr. Elisheva
Baumgarten teaches history in the Faculty of Jewish History and in the Gender
Studies Program at Bar Ilan Univ.

 

 

Brotherhood Obligates
Consideration of – and Sensitivity to – the Other's Basket

From Kadesh, Moshe sent
messengers to the king of Edom: "Thus says your brother Israel: You know
all the hardships that have befallen us; that our ancestors went down to Egypt,
that we dwelt in Egypt a long time, and that the Egyptians dealt harshly with us
and our ancestors. We cried to the Lord and He heard our plea, and He sent a
messenger who freed us from Egypt. Now we are in Kadesh, the town on the border
of your territory. Allow us, then, to cross your country. We will not pass
through fields or vineyards, and we will not drink water from wells. We will
follow the king's highway, turning off neither to the right not to the left
until we have crossed your territory.

                                                                                    (Bemidbar 20:14-17)

 

"Your brother Israel" Why did he find it necessary
to mention brotherhood? In order that Edom take pity on Israel, a kindred
people, descendents of twin brothers, Esav and Yaakov
.

                                                                 (Abarbanel, ibid., ibid.)

 

"You know all the
hardships that have befallen us"
they [Moshe's messengers] replied to him [the king of
Edom], You know that when The Holy One, Blessed Be He, said to Avraham "Know,
yes know, that your seed will be a sojourner… and they shall be enslaved,
etc."
(Bereishit 15) – we were enslaved and you
were free, etc.
To what may this be compared? To two brothers whose father owed money.
One of them paid the debt. At a later time, he asked to borrow something from
his brother, saying: You know that the debt which I repaid was our joint
obligation; I paid it, therefore do not refuse the favor which I ask.

 (Tanhuma, Hukkat, 12)

 

 

 

 

There Were No Better Days for Israel than the
15th of Av
(Taanit 26b)

In
view of last year's success, and in answer to the religious public's demand, we
again offer a dream vacation during the week of 15th Ab (23.7.02) in the
seashore town of Mombassa in Kenya. The vacation includes: Safari, tour and
hikes (with an Israeli company), accommodations in a luxury hotel, in a
religious atmosphere and with kosher food.
On the premises are a synagogue
and Sefer Torah, all under the supervision of Rabbi Shalom Tsadok, may he merit
a good and long life, a Torah personality recognized in Israel. For details
and/or registration, contact Rivka or Efrayim – Telephones 02 – 6791116 and 052
– 282 556.

Additional
vacations will take place during the summer recess.

 

 

Editorial Board: Pinchas Leiser (Editor), Miriam
Fine (Coordinator), Itzhak Frankenthal and Dr. Menachem Klein

Translation: Kadish Goldberg

This weekly publication was made possible by:

The Moriah Fund, the Tisch Foundation and private
donors

 

To our readers:

We will be happy to have you actively participate in "Shabbat
Shalom" by:

·     
Letters to the editor

·     
Publication of Divrei Torah (in coordination with the
editorial board)

For details, contact Miriam Fine (053-920206 or 02-6730196)

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards
its publication and distribution.

  • Hebrew edition distributed in Israel $1000
  • English edition distributed via email $
    100

Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc.
Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in
advance to appear in the English email.

 

US, Canadia or British tax-exempt contributions to OzveShalom may be
made through the New Israel Fund or through P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc.

Contributions should be marked as donor-advised
to OzveShalom/Netivot Shalom, the Shabbat Shalom project.

New Israel Fund, POB 53410, Jerusalem 91534 (Please include Israeli
address and telephone number)

New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New Israel Fund of Canada, 801 Eglinton Ave. West, Suite #401, Toronto,
Ontario M5N 1E3 Canada (Canadian tax exemption)

New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street, London W1H 2DD,
United Kingdom (British tax exemption)

P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite 607, New
York, New York 10017 USA

 

About us:

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of
a civil society in Israel. It is committed to promoting the ideals of
tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts which have always been central to
Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of
Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value. It believes
that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to support the
pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a
fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an
option but an imperative.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's programs include both educational and
protest activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences and weekend
programs are held for students, educators and families, as well as joint
seminars for Jews, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities focus on
issues of human rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and responses to
issues of particular religious relevance.

9,000 copies of a 4 page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah
reading are written and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are
distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email.
Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom`s educational forums draw people of different
backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to deepen their Jewish
knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint on the subjects of
peace and social issues.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot
Shalom fills an ideological vacuum in Israel's society. Committed both to
Jewish tradition and observance, and to the furthering of peace and
coexistence, the movement is in a unique position to engage in dialogue with
the secular left and the religious right, with Israeli Arabs and with
Palestinians.

Our activities are funded by donations and one
part time employee.

OzveShalom/Netivot Shalom                Tel./Fax
972-2-5664218

Pob 4433                                             Email:
ozshalom@netvision.net.il

Jerusalem 94310, Israel                        www.
netivot-shalom.org.il