Emor 5764 – Gilayon #341
(link to original page)
Click here to
receive the weekly parsha by email each week.
Parashat Emor
COMMAND THE ISRAELITE PEOPLE TO
BRING YOU CLEAR OIL OF BEATEN OLIVES FOR LIGHTING, FOR KINDLING LAMPS REGULARLY.
(Vayikra
24: 2)
To bring to you clear oil of
beaten olives – This
section is repeated, because the menorah
is
next to the table in order to illuminate the table bearing the lehem ha'panim
[the bread of display]. Here is explicitly stated that all of this is done forthe sake of setting up the table: the oil for illumination and the loaf for
setting upon the table.
(RaShBaM
on Vayikra 24:2)
Rabbi
Hayyei taught: Olive oil – and not sesame seed oil or oil from nuts, and
not oil of radishes, and not almond oil, rather olive oil from your olives.
Rabbi
Abin said: It is like the parable of the king whose legions had mutinied
against him, but one of his legions had not. The king said: "Dukes,
governors, and officers shall arise from that legion which did not mutiny
against me." Similarly, the Holy One Blessed be He said: "This olive
tree brought light to the world in the days of Noah, as is written, The dove
came back to him toward evening, and there in its bill was a plucked-off olive
leaf (Bereishit
8:11)."
(Vayikra
Rabbah 31)
Economics, Justice, and Holiness
Deborah Greiniman
Only too rarely does a book of general
interest come along, which illuminates the Torah's wisdom in a striking,
challenging, and empowering manner. Such is my reception of the book Guns,
Germs, and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies (New York:
Norton, 1996), by the American scientist and author, Jared Diamond.
In the book's central theory, Diamond
suggests a system of causes which explain why the peoples of South-West Asia
(including our own region), and eventually Europe achieved world-wide hegemony,
placing the "undeveloped" countries under their imperial rule. He
claims that the development of civilizations in specific localities is
determined by the presence of easily domesticated flora and fauna in the
natural environment, rather than by inherited racial traits of human
populations. The achievements of the Europeans and of their descendants in the
New World have nothing to do with the alleged intellectual superiority of the white
race. On the contrary – Diamond tends to believe that hunter-gatherers, who
must exercise their understanding of nature's secrets in ever-changing
circumstances and on a daily basis, are likely to be more intelligent
than agriculturalists.
While developing this
conclusion, Diamond tracks the rise of civilization as founded upon the
development of agriculture. (Even if this notion is not Diamond's own original
idea, I am grateful for the clarity with which he sets it out.) He explains
that hunter-gatherer societies are relatively egalitarian. While they do posses
a certain hierarchical structure – tribal chief, patriarch, etc. – high-status
individuals in hunter-gatherer societies do not enjoy significantly better standards
of living than do those whom they rule. Society members create sophisticated
mechanisms for the settlement of conflicts. After all, when people are
constantly busy with the search for nourishment, they do not have time to
nurture feuds.
Agriculture's great advantage is that
it allows people to store food for future use, granting nutritional security to
most of the population and creating the possibility of storable surpluses. People
no longer have to wander in search of food, and some society members can get
away with not directly contributing to the nourishment of the group. Agriculture
creates the basis for a settled community in which whole groups of people are
engaged in activities that are not immediately concerned with the procurement
of food, such as priests, artists, artisans, governing officials, and soldiers
who can win control over territories and peoples. Such societies are
stratified, because unequal crop-yields and the trade in agricultural surpluses
invite unequal accumulation of natural resources, and, in addition, those of
higher status can use their position and power to extract taxes from the other
members of the community.
This short account of Diamond's theory takes
me directly to this week's parasha, and to the series of parashiyot which
describe the social arrangements that were supposed to characterize future society
in the Land of Israel. The Torah views the world from an explicitly wilderness
view-point. It speaks to a people that has temporarily returned to a nomadic
existence, a people which gathers its food daily, wandering through the immense
no-man's-land that separates the great Egyptian civilization from the Promised
Land. From this external perspective, the Torah creates an ideal society that
is attuned to its environment. According to the Torah, it was Joseph, one of
Israel's founding fathers, who designed Egypt's economic system. This system
concentrated ownership of all resources in the hands of the centralized
government, which enslaved vast sectors of the population including,
eventually, the Hebrews themselves. Undoubtedly, the Torah completely rejects
this system, despite its illustrious inventor. However, God does intend Israel
to abandon the relatively egalitarian nomadic life it knew in the wilderness
and to adopt the ways of a settled society upon their entry to the Land. The
Torah foresaw the problems that would attend conversion to an agricultural
economy; social stratification, unequal distribution of resources,
concentration of capital in the hands of the regime leading to the corruption
of values, widespread poverty and servitude, exploitation of the poor by the
wealthy, repression of the weakest elements of society – the widows, orphans,
strangers, and hired laborers.
In a remarkably bold and idealistic
fashion, the Torah tries to pre-empt all of these ills with the help of social
legislation, the most radical, no doubt, being the laws of the Sabbatical and
Jubilee years. These were set to periodically shatter the expected social
inequalities, more or less returning everyone to the original distribution of
resources while establishing a break from everyday concerns that could be
devoted to Torah study. It is as if in the Sabbatical year everyone returns to
a kind of nomadic life in which nature's bounty becomes available to all,
irrespective of social status. Even during the regular years the Torah does not
rely upon the occasional generosity of the land-owners; it applies easily
understood, hard and fast rules to execute the redistribution of food to the
needy, regardless of the root causes of their impoverishment. The laws of pe'ah
and leket make the edges of a field as well as the field itself into
a public space into which the poor may freely enter to gather food, further
limiting private property for the good of society in general.
The Chief Rabbi of the U.K., Rabbi
Jonathan Sacks, points out in his book, The Dignity of Difference: How to
Avoid the Clash of Civilizations (London-New York: Continuum, 2002), that
the Torah actually views the free market and private property in a favorable
light and is reconciled to the unavoidable inequalities they bring. One might
say that the Torah's ideal society shares something with Thomas Jefferson's
vision of a society of free and independent farmers. (Except, of course, that
the Torah requires the existence of priestly and Levite classes, which do not own
land and are supported by taxation of the people so that they can be free to
engage in the worship of God, conflict resolution, Torah study, cultural
creation, etc.) However, such a society will not be able to sustain itself, and
will not bring honor to the Name of God which is called upon it, if its
inequalities become so drastic that they corrupt its values, distract its
members from the worship of God, cast down some of its sons and daughters into
poverty, and even enslave the poor to their creditors and the strangers and
aliens to their employers.
I find a nice expression of the proper scale
of values in a single verse that occupies a crucial juncture in our parasha. In
the middle of the description of the festivals, between Shavuot and Rosh
Hashanah, the Torah interrupts itself to mention:
And when you reap the harvest of your
land, you shall not reap all the way to the edges of your field, or gather the gleanings
of your harvest; you shall leave them for the poor and the stranger: I am the
Lord your God. (Vayikra 23:22)
RaMBaN explains:
That is to say that when you arrive at
the land and reap the first Omer of the harvest [to be offered at the
Temple], do not count the edge of he field as available for the omer,
and do not gather the gleanings, so that the mitzvah (of the omer)
should not have priority over these prohibitions [regarding the edges and the
gleanings].
That is to say, despite all the
largesse that is supposed to characterize the service of God, one may certainly
not add to the mitzvah of the omer at the price of diminishing the
quantity of food which belongs to the poor by right, which they need to
survive. The apparently illogical placement of this verse, and its repetition
of the verse from parashat Kedoshim (19:9), underlines the idea that Torah
considers the observance of its social legislation to be no less important than
the observance of all of the festivals, including Shabbat, with all of their
attendant rules and regulations. These social laws are not thought of as
belonging to a separate category of "commandments between man and his
fellow man." Rather, together with observance of the holidays and of
kashrut, they are integral elements in life of a people that strives for
holiness.
Today, when we have returned to our
Land after living a nomadic life in the Diaspora, how long can we ignore the
Torah's demand that we establish a society whose every son and daughter can live
in dignity, in which all will find leisure that allows them to contemplate the
words of the Torah and wave the omer before God?
Deborah
Greiniman edits Nashim, a journal for the study of women and gender in
Judaism. She is an editor in the National Academy of Sciences, and also writes
and translates.
For stranger and citizen alike
You
shall have one standard for stranger and citizen alike; for I am the Lord your
God:
The God of the stranger and the God of the citizen, the noble are not
preferred to the wretched (Job 34:19).
(Seforno
Vayikra 24:22)
One
standard for stranger and citizen alike: A gentile who comes from a
foreign land and separates himself from it is called a ger [stranger],
from gargir [a berry] which has separated from the tree. He whose
fathers are of the city is an ezrah [citizen], as in the verse, well-rooted
like a robust ezrah [native tree] (Tehillim 37:35). He
is similar to one planted from ancient times – and so it says that the law will
be the same for all of them.
For
I am the Lord your God: If you followed this law then I am
your God, and from the affirmative statement we learn a negative one: When
someone does not follow this law it is as if he is denying that
God is his God, and has rejected the essence of faith. It is known that all of
the beliefs and laws of the nations are interpretations of the Torah, and the laws
of the Torah are among the principles of faith. When we do not follow them we
desecrate the Name [of God], and those who could protest [transgression of the
law equating strangers with citizens] but do not desecrate the Name, lend honor
to idolatry, disparage Moses' Torah, and diminish Israel's wealth: for the
entire world is dependent upon laws.
(Rabbeinu
Behayeiy on Vayikra 24:22)
All Torah that is without Labor…:
Rabbis Yishmael and Shimon bar Yohai
The
Rabbis taught: And you shall gather in your new grain (Devarim 11:
14)
– what does this teach us?
Since
it is said, Let not this book of Torah cease from your lips (Joshua 1:8) –
[one might wonder] should this be taken literally?"We
learn from the verse And you shall gather in your new grain – act in
accordance with the custom of the land [i.e., work for a living]"; these
are the words of Rabbi Yishmael.
Rabbi
Shimon bar Yohai says: "Can a man plow in the season of plowing, sew seeds
in the season for sowing, harvest in the harvest season, thresh in the threshing
season, winnow when it is windy – what shall become of the Torah? Rather, when
Israel does God's will their work is performed by others, for it is said, Strangers
shall stand and pasture your flocks (Yishayahu 61:5). But
when Israel does not perform God's will, they have to do their own work for
themselves, for it is said, and you shall gather in your new grain. Not
only that, but they have to do the work of others, for it is said, and you
shall serve your enemies (Devarim 28:48)." Abbayay said: "Many did as
Rabbi Yishmael [said] – and succeeded, as Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai [said] – and
they did not succeed."
(Berakhot
35b)
On Delusions and False Messiahs
[After] Bar Koziba (Bar Kokhba) reigned
for two and a half years, he said to the Rabbis: "I am the Messiah."
They
told him: "It is written that the Messiah will be able to pass judgment by
sense of smell, let us see if he can pass judgment by sense of smell." When
they saw that he could not pas judgment by sense of smell – they [the Romans] killed
him
(Sanhedrin
93b)
A
kokhav [star] rises from Jacob (Bamidbar 23:17) – do
not say kokhav, say kozev [disappointer].
When
Rabbi Akiva saw Bar Koziva (Bar Kokhba), he said: "That is King Messiah."
Rabbi
Yohanan ben Torata said to him: "Akiva! Grass will be growing from your cheeks
and he will have yet to arrive."
(Eikhah
Rabbah 2)
Do
not think that King Messiah will have to perform signs and wonders, bring
anything new into being, revive the dead, or do similar things. It is not so. Rabbi
Akiva was a great sage, a teacher of the Mishnah, yet he was also the
armor-bearer of Ben Kozba. He affirmed that the later was King Messiah; he and
all the wise men of his generation shared this belief until Ben Koziba was
slain in [his] iniquity, when it became known that he was not (the Messiah). Yet
the rabbis had not asked him for a sign or token. The general principle is:
this Law of ours with its statutes and ordinances (is not subject to change). It
is forever and all eternity; it is not to be added to or to be taken away from.
(RaMBaM
Hilkhot Melakhim 11:3, English from pg. 223 of Twerskey's A
Maimonides Reader)
Thanks
to your help, print publication of the Shabbat Shalom's Hebrew edition and its
distribution in Israeli synagogues has resumed! Just a small additional bit of
generosity on the part of our readers will guaranty that print publication will
continue through the rest of this year.
Checks should be made out to "Oz V'Shalom" (Please
write "For Shabbat Shalom" on the back of the check) and sent to:
"Oz V'Shalom-Netivot Shalom"
P.O.B. 4433, Yerushalayim 91043
Shabbat Shalom is available on our
website: www.netivot-shalom.org.il
If you wish to subscribe to the email
Hebrew or English editions of Shabbat Shalom, to print copies of it for
distribution in your synagogue, to inquire regarding the dedication of an
edition in someone's honor or memory, to find out about how to make tax-exempt
donations, or to suggest additional helpful ideas, please contact Miriam Fine
at +97253920206 or at ozshalom@netvision.net.il
With God's help and your own, we will
rise ever higher.
Editorial Board of Shabbat Shalom
Executive Board of Oz Ve'Shalom-Netivot
Shalom.
If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider
contributing towards its publication and distribution.
- Hebrew
edition distributed in Israel $1000
- English
edition distributed via email $ 100
Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event,
person, simcha, etc. Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the
Hebrew, 10 days in advance to appear in the English email.
Tax exempt contributions to Oz VeShalom may be made
through the New Israel Fund or PEF.
Contributions should be marked as donor-advised to
OzVeShalom/Netivot Shalom, Shabbat Shalom project.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW ISRAEL FUND IS NO LONGER
ACCEPTING DONATIONS UNDER $50. FOR DONATIONS BETWEEN $50 AND $999 THEY ARE
CHARGING A $50 SERVICE CHARGE. DONATIONS ABOVE $1000 ARE CHARGED A 5% FEE.
New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC
20090-1588, USA
New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street,
London W1H 2DD, Great Britain
PEF will also channel donations and provide a
tax-exemptions. Donations should be sent to P.E.F. Israel Endowment
Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite 607, New York, New York 10017 USA
About us:
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated
to the advancement of a civil society in Israel. It is committed to promoting
the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts which have always
been central to Jewish tradition and law.
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment
to the land of Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value.
It believes that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to
support the pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us
to create a fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs
is not an option but an imperative.
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's programs include both
educational and protest activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences
and weekend programs are held for students, educators and families, as well as
joint seminars for Jews, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities
focus on issues of human rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and
responses to issues of particular religious relevance.
9,000 copies of a 4 page peace oriented commentary
on the weekly Torah reading are written and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot
Shalom and they are distributed to over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent
overseas via email. Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom's educational forums
draw people of different backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to
deepen their Jewish knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint
on the subjects of peace and social issues.
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom fills an ideological
vacuum in Israel's society. Committed both to Jewish tradition and observance,
and to the furthering of peace and coexistence, the movement is in a unique
position to engage in dialogue with the secular left and the religious right,
with Israeli Arabs and with Palestinians.