Acharei Mot 5770 – Gilayon #647
(link to original page)
Click here to
receive the weekly parsha by email each week.
Parshat Achary Mot – Kedoshim
And Aaron shall place lots upon the two he goats:
one lot "For the Lord," and the other lot,
"For Azazel."
(Vayikra
16:8)
…regarding this I think it more correct [to
say] that the two goats alluded to the entire Israelite community, but in
different senses. When they were good and upright, following their God and
cleaving to Him, then they will be for the Lord. Their sacrificed
portions and inner parts, which I have explained allude to their inner
thoughts, will be offered up on the Lord's altar. Their blood will be brought
into the innermost sanctuary, it will be sprinkled on the covering of the Ark
and before the covering; this alludes to cleaving to God. They will be granted
life in the World to Come and will dwell beneath the wings of the Divine
Presence. Referring to this it is said: one lot "For the Lord"
(verse 8). For there lot refers to the reward given to a
person in accordance with his righteousness or his wickedness. As it is said: and He hires a fool for wages, and He hires transients for
wages. And the wage [or reward] is called goral – "lot"
– as it is said in Daniel 12:13: And you, go to the end, and you will rest and rise to your
lot at the end of the days… if the Israelites were wicked and
sinned against God and did not keep His observances or protect the honor of His
Temple, their lot and portion would be Azazel, i.e., to be separated from the
exalted Lord and his holy things. They would become a brazen-faced people and
an enemy would send them of to exile. Azazel is a name composed from two
words: az and azel. That is to say, this people will go and be
sent off from its land when it is an am az panim – a brazen-faced
people. Its punishment in this world will be that they will leave the land and
become separated from the pleasures of the righteous and the light of the
Divine Presence. All of this is included in the name Azazel: the brazen-faced
will go to shame and eternal disgrace.
(Abarbanel
Vayikra 16:5-28)
…each of us is like a
"goat." Each has been granted to the power to resist, and each is
capable of strongly resisting any request made of him. The moral worth of our
lives depends on how we employ that power. We can decide to use the power of
resistance in accordance with God's permission and under His authority. We can
be like the goat for the Lord, and resist all of the inner and outer
stimuli that seduce us away from the Lord. Or, we can decide to be like the goat
for Azazel and exercise our power of resistance
by refusing to listen to the Lord's voice.
(Rabbi S. R. Hirsch on Vayikra
16:10)
Desire and Holiness
Gabi Strenger
The connection of parashat Aharei Mot with
parashat Kedoshim points towards a connection between the command you shall
be holy and the list of prohibited sexual liaisons which concludes Aharei
Mot. Following Midrash Rabbah, Rashi concludes that holiness means avoidance of
illicit relations. RaMBaN, in contrast, finds holiness in a person's
willingness to sanctify himself in those things that are permitted him. Otherwise,
"the lustful person will find a way to be awash in salaciousness with his
one or several wives… and thus will be a scoundrel with the Torah's
permission." RaMBaN feels that observance of the Halakhah does not
guarantee a person's high spiritual level. In order to reach holiness – which
is beyond the minimum halakhic obligations – a person must limit his bodily
pleasures.
Throughout the years of my career as a
psychologist I have found myself wondering about the connection between desire
and holiness. To what extent do sensual pleasures keep us apart from God and
from the holy souls within us? Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis,
discovered a profound truth when he said that the human ego and spiritual world
can only develop when urges are restrained and society's moral restrictions
accepted. On the other hand, psychoanalysis recognizes the high price paid when
a person's real self – including his urges and desires – is constantly
repressed. So – to what extent are desire and holiness opposed to each other,
and to what extent do they enrich each other? One central discussion of these
questions may be found in the accounts offered by Hassidic literature of the
notion of bitul – "abnegation." The Baal Shem Tov's disciple
and successor, the Maggid of Mezeritch (1710-1772) demands abnegation of all the
self's needs and desires. Similarly to Buddhism, which holds that human
suffering results from people being too attached to their desires, the Maggid's
school calls for people to overcome their material needs which stand in the way
between them and their genuine purpose – clinging to the Holy One, blessed be
He. Since we are in the middle of season of counting the Omer, I might mention
the drasha for parashat Emor of the "Alter Rebbe," Rabbi Shneur
Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812) that is found in his Likutei Torah. There he
states that the purpose of counting the Omer is to bring about "abnegation
of will from the animal soul," as is symbolized by the Omer offering
(which consists of barley, a grain used as animal feed). R. Yehudah Leib Alter
(1847-1905), author of Sefat Emet, often dealt with the various meaning
of bitul – abnegation. His writings present us with a complex
understanding of the term and a complex approach to bodily pleasure. On the one
hand, he often speaks of the need for separation from the things of this world,
while on the other hand, he takes many opportunities to say that each and every
thing in our world contains an inner divine spark, and that we must connect to
that bit of divinity through profound engagement with the world. In one of the
discourses in Sefat Emet on our parasha (Kedoshim,
5638, s.v. Bamidrash) we can easily notice the tension between
these two directions of thought: "For they can arouse holiness even in
this world, even though the principle of holiness is separation from this
world. In any event, every thing contains sparks of holiness, especially in the
acts of an Israelite. That is what is written in Psalms 92, the Lord is
exalted from the world, meaning that even in the world itself, which is the
material existence of nature, despite all this it has in it the exalted
existence of the blessed Creator." On the one hand, holiness is gained
through self-restraint, but on the other hand, recognition of divine immanence
allows us to find God's exaltedness within material life (exalted from the
world). This complexity finds expression in one of the Sefat Emet's
favorite and paradoxical phrases: in regards to the things of this world,
"their abnegation is their preservation." We must "tie the
soul's illumination to the body as well" (Parashat
Tavo, 6534, s.v. vehotirkha). In his comments to parashat Bo (5654, s.v. b'inyan), Sefat Emet
even claims that the human body is no less a part of tefillin then are
the parchment, the ink, and the housings [batim]. He even implies that
tefillin gain their holiness thanks to the body which wears them, and not
vice-versa, as we usually think. These ideas should be seen as continuing the
tradition of "worship through materiality" – avoda begashmiyut
– which began in teachings of Haddism's founder, the Baal Shem Tov, in the
spirit of the verse, In all your ways, know Him.
In Judaism, holiness is experienced via the
body. The Rebbi from Kotzk lent this idea wonderfully succinct expression in
his famous Yiddish translation of the expression anshei kodesh
[literally: "men of holiness"] (Shemot22:30)
: menshlich heilig – "human holiness." Theconcluding dictum of Kiddushin in the Jerusalem Talmud (4:12) is also well known: "In the future a person will
have to make an accounting for everything his eye saw that he did not
eat." The pleasures of life occupy a central place in the commandments of
Judaism, as we find, for example, in the holiday feasts and the commandment to
enjoy pleasures on the Sabbath – oneg Shabbat. God's voice echoes
through material existence; it is precisely the full and conscious experience
of the sensual which allows us to connect with the Creator's power. World
literature offers us a wonderful expression of the idea that engagement in the
world is the gate to divinity in Siddhartha, a book written by the Swiss
novelist Herman Hesse. In a move opposite to that of The Monk Who Sold His
Ferrari, the Hindu monk Siddhartha decides to return to full engagement
with the world and its pleasures. This is how he describes the realizations
which brought him to that decision: "I was afraid of myself, I was fleeing
from myself! I searched Atman [my soul], I searched Brahman [Divinity], I was
willing to dissect my self and peel off all of its layers, to find the core of all
peels in its unknown interior, the Atman, life, the divine part, the ultimate
part. But I have lost myself in the process… [but now] blue was blue, river
was river, and if also in the blue and the river, in Siddhartha, the singular
and divine lived hidden, so it was still that very divinity's way and purpose,
to be here yellow, here blue, there sky, there forest, and here Siddhartha. The
purpose and the essential properties were not somewhere behind the things, they
were in them, in everything (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2500/2500.txt).
This passage accurately expresses the painful disillusionment experienced by many
religious and Haredi people I have met in my clinic – men and women who feel
that their search for the transcendent God has led them to miss out on real
life. Some of them are angry, they feel that their religious education coerced
them into giving up too much of their desires for love, sex, and self-actualization.
Some leave religion, while others decide, like Siddhartha, to seek contact with
the Divine Presence that dwells in life’s small yet beautiful things – and
sometimes they seek it in passion's power.
Lately, several public figures in Israel – including,
sadly, rabbis – have been involved in embarrassing sex scandals. It should be
clear that these scandals are only the tip of the iceberg. Unfortunately, men
and women who feel unable to find passion and desire in the natural course of
life try to seek unhealthy compensation for their feelings of loss and missed
opportunities; sometimes this harms others. True, it is the Internet which
offers the most common means of compensation, via consumption of sick and
perverted sexuality. This is a genuine plague – the acts of the land of
Egypt anf the land of Canaan of our own day – and it will not be solved by
clever censorship programs or any other technological fix. Instead, we must
begin to reconsider the relationship between desire and holiness in religious
education. We must stop telling our children that sexuality belongs to the
animalistic part of us. The opposite is true: the erotic relationship is a
specifically human phenomenon! It includes, more than any other experience, all
the strata of human experience: body, soul, and spirit. Let us give our young
people genuine assistance in making their way through the perplexing tangle
encompassed by pathological pornography, healthy desire, and exalted holiness. Our
educators must get across the deep message contained in the phrase,
"sanctify yourself in that which is permitted to you" – that, at its
best, sensual experience serves as a vehicle both for the spiritual growth and
sanctity of the individual as well as for a profound encounter with another
person. We must educate towards a better balance between the expression of
drives and self-restraint. We must tell those who study the literature of mussar
and Hassidism that the path to holiness is like ascending a ladder, and that bitul
hatzmiyut – "self abnegation" – is a rung that only becomes
relevant after the self has become strong and healthy. We should recall in this
connection the words of Or HaHayim relating to our parasha: "You
shall be holy – this is in the future tense, meaning: There is no end to
this commandment, for whatever gate of holiness one enters, it always
constitutes an entrance towards a yet higher gate, for there is no measure to
the levels of holiness available to anyone who wishes to take on the
task." The way to holiness is a dynamic process and it is unhealthy to try
to make progress by skipping stages. Therefore, the path to holiness is also
necessarily personal and it cannot be dictated by set universal rules (see the
Emek Davar's commentary on the verse And you shall be holy). It indeed
seems that the challenge of creating a "human holiness" has never
been greater than in our own day.
Gabi Strenger is a clinical psychologist.
Twice a month he and Dr. Eli Holtzer deliver a class on Sefat Emet in
Jerusalem.
When a stranger
resides in your land, you shall not wrong him. (Vayikra 19:33)
The True Ethical
Test is In Your Land
We learned – Rabbi
Eliezer HaGadol says: Why does the Torah warn us thirty six times – some say:
forty-six times – regarding [mistreatment of] the stranger? Lest you drive him
back to evil ways. Why is it written, You shall not wrong a stranger or
oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt (Shemot 23:20)? They learned – Rabbi Natan
says: Do not point out your own shortcoming [i.e., having been a stranger
yourself] in others.
(Bava Metziya 59b)
A stranger
resides in your land: If he was a stranger in a foreign country where
you too are a stranger, it would only be natural to love him, for it is the
custom of strangers [i.e. aliens] to love each other (Pesahim 113), and you sympathize with his troubles in order to
avoid them yourself. But if he lives in your land, in any case do not
wrong him.
(Ha-Amek Davar Vayikra 19:33)
One is also prohibited to wrong a stranger in the Diaspora.
The expression in your land appears in order to explicate the nature of
this wrong: When you dwell in the land, which I have given to you as a
possession, you might say, "It was given to us as an inheritance,"
and you will not be considerate of the stranger who dwells among you, since he
has no part or portion in it. You will wrong him with words that humiliate and
degrade him. Similarly, the expression to wrong is always used by
Scripture to speak of the action of the powerful against the weak, those who
benefit from the disadvantage of the weak.
(R. Yitzhak Shemuel
Reggio's commentary on Vayikra 19:33)
And love your
neighbor as yourself
And love your
neighbor as yourself – Rabbi Akiva says: This is the great principle of the
Torah.
Ben Azzai says: This
is the record of Adam's line [When God created man, He made him in the likeness
of God] (Bereishit 5:1) is an even
greater principle.
(Sifra, Kedoshim 2)
It cannot be understood
literally, since it is well-known that "your life takes precedence over
that of your friend." Rather, the RaMBaM (Hilkhot
Avel 14) explains it as meaning "[doing for your friend] as you
would wish your friend would do for you." It is obvious that no one would
expect his friend to love him as much as he loves himself, but rather to the
proper extent taking into account good manners and how close the people are to
each other – to that same degree you must love other people. That is why it [love
your neighbor…] appears immediately after the preceding admonition [You
shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge]. Just as in the case when you
wrong someone, you would not want him to take vengeance, but you would rather
have him forgive your sin, so you should treat your neighbor as well. This is
how the juxtaposition of the passages is to be interpreted according to the
RaMBaM.
I learned another
explanation of their juxtaposition from the Jerusalem Talmud (Nedarim 9:4), which states:
It is written; You shall not take
vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. How does this work? If
one cuts meat [with one hand] and accidentally cuts [the other] hand would he
then cut the ["offending"] hand? And love your neighbor as
yourself. Rabbi Akiva says: This is the great principle of the Torah.
This means that one who
takes vengeance against his fellow is like someone who cuts meat. The hand
holding the knife is negligent and cuts the other hand. Could someone imagine
striking the hand that cut to avenge it? Similarly, love your neighbor as
yourself follows you shall not take vengeance. Even though one's own
life and well-being take precedence over those of one's friend, in any case it
is as if the two were one in the same person – even though it be proper for one
limb to strike the other, in any case if the damage is already done there is no
point to taking vengeance against the offending limb. Similarly, one should not
take vengeance against one's fellow who has already harmed him, since he is
just like you, all of Israel being a single soul.
(NeTziV MiVolozhon's Ha-Amek Davar, Vayikra
19:18).
And love your
neighbor as yourself – Not that one should love every person as he
actually loves himself, for that is impossible, and Rabbi Akiva already taught
that "Your life takes precedence over your friend's life." Rather as
yourself in the sense of [your neighbor] who is like you
– as in [the verse] for you are like unto Pharaoh. So here too as well Love
your neighbor who is as yourself; he is equal to you and similar to
you in that he was also created in the image of God, he is a human
being just as you are, and that includes all human beings, for they
were all created in the divine image. The Torah concluded [in the passage]
everything with this commandment, just as it began with each man shall fear
his mother and father, because one who honors the human image and considers
it excellences treats himself and all other people well.
(R. Yitzhak Shemuel Reggio on Vayikra 18:19)
You Shall Rise Before the Aged And Show Deference To The Old –An
Expression Of Human Dignity
One must rise before one
who is very old, even if he is not a wise man; even a young man who is wise
must rise before a very old man, but he is not required to rise fully, but just
enough to show deference, and even if he be an old Cuthean, one
must honor him in speech and offer a hand to support him, as is written, You
shall rise before the aged –
this refers to every
old person.
(RaMBaM,
Laws of Talmud Torah 6:9)
Good News for Our
Readers
The book Drishat Shalom
is on sale in bookstores!
It is published by Yediot
– Sefarim in memory of our member,
Gerald Cromer z"l.
Drishat Shalom is
edited by Tzvi Mazeh and Pinchas Leiser and contains articles based on divrei
Torah which first appeared in the pages of Shabbat Shalom. It deals
with the encounter between the values of peace and justice drawn from Jewish
sources and the complicated reality of a sovereign Jewish state in the Land of
Israel.
Publication of the book was
supported by the Gerald Cromer Memorial Fund, the 12th of Heshvan Forum, Oz
VeShalom, a Dutch peace fund, and many friends.
We need your support in order that the voice of a religious Zionism
committed to peace and justice will continue to be heard through the
uninterrupted distribution of Shabbat Shalom
in hundreds of synagogues, on the Internet and via email in both
Hebrew and English.
In Israel, checks payable to Oz VeShalom may be sent to Oz
VeShalom-P.O.B. 4433, Jerusalem 91043.
US and British tax-exempt contributions to Oz VeShalom may be made
through:
New Israel Fund, POB 91588, Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA
New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford Street, London W1H 2DD,
Great Britain
Please note that the NIF is no longer accepting donations under $100
PEF will also channel donations and provide a tax-exemption. Donations
should be sent to P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison Ave., Suite
607, New York, New York 10017 USA
All contributions to either the NIF or PEF should be marked as
donor-advised to Oz ve'Shalom, the Shabbat Shalom project. For Donations
to NIF, please mention that Oz veShalom is registered as no. 5708.
If you wish to subscribe to the email English editions of Shabbat
Shalom, to print copies of it for distribution in your synagogue, to inquire
regarding the dedication of an edition in someone’s honor or memory, to find
out how to make tax-exempt donations, or to suggest additional helpful ideas,
please call +972-52-3920206 or at ozshalom@netvision.net.il
If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom, please consider contributing towards
its publication and distribution.
- Hebrew edition distributed in Israel
$700
- English edition distributed via email $
100
Issues may be dedicated in honor of an event, person, simcha, etc.
Requests must be made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in
advance to appear in the English email.
About us
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of
a civil society in Israel. It is committed to promoting the ideals of
tolerance, pluralism, and justice, concepts that have always been central to
Jewish tradition and law.
Oz Veshalom-Netivot Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of
Israel and it no less views peace as a central religious value. It believes
that Jews have both the religious and the national obligation to support the
pursuit of peace. It maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a
fair and just society, and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an
option but an imperative.
4,500 copies
of a 4-page peace oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are written
and published by Oz VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are distributed to over
350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email. Our web site is
www.netivot-shalom.org.il.
Shabbat Shalom is available on our website: www.netivot-shalom.org.il