THESE WERE THE MARCHES OF THE ISRAELITES WHO STARTED OUT

FROM THE LAND OF EGYPT, TROOP BY TROOP, IN THE CHARGE OF MOSES AND AARON.

(Bamidbar 33:1)

The Significance

of Recounting the Marches – What is Important to Remember?

It is comparable to a king whose son was ill, and he took

him to a far away place to cure him. When they started home, his father began

recounting all of the legs of the journey. He said to him: "Here we slept,

here we were cold, here your head ached, etc."

(Rashi on Bamidbar 33:1)

These were the marches of the

Israelites – The Holy One blessed be He

said to Moses: Write down the marches which the Israelites made through the

wilderness, so that they will know how many miracles I performed for them on

each march. It is comparable to a king whose son was ill, and he took him to a

far away place to cure him. When they started home, his father began recounting

all of the legs of the journey. He said to him: "Here we slept, here we

were cold, here your head ached, etc."

Thus spoke the Holy One blessed be He to Moses: Count for

them all the places where they angered me. That is why it is said These were the marches of the Israelites.

That it is written: I lead your nation like sheep – Just

as sheep are not brought in under a roof, so too the Israelites did not gather

under a roof for forty years… Another idea: Just as food is not gathered up

for sheep, but rather they forage in the wilderness, so too Israel was fed for

forty years without stocks of food. Another idea: Just as sheep follow where

their shepherd leads them, so Israel followed to everywhere Moses and Aaron

would take them.

(Yalkut Shimoni 786)

Stings in your eyes and thorns in your

sides

Rami Pinchover

We read special haftarot during the three weeks between the 17^th

of Tammuz and the 9^th of Av ("bein

ha'meitzarim"). These haftarot

consist for the most part of rebukes for the sins of ingratitude and walking in

the paths of the nations, combined with serious interpersonal transgressions. The

three or four parashiyot (especially Matot and Mase'ei) read in this

period seem rather disconnected from their haftarot.

I want to consider the

relationship between the Israelites and the peoples who they conquered or who

became their neighbors in the light of the parasha of

Massaei, the days of bein

ha'mitzarim, and the rebukes made by the prophet

Jeremiah.

At the end of the innocent and

biographical list of marches, we are unexpectedly confronted with two verses

that are painful to every Jew who has been brought up with Rabbi Akiva's motto:

Beloved is man, for he was

created in the [Divine] image. Additional love was shown to him in that he was

made to know that he had been created in the [Divine] image, for it is said, He

created man in the image of God (Bereishit 9). (Avot

3:14)

Here is what is said in our parasha:

But if you do not dispossess the

inhabitants of the land, those whom you allow to remain shall be stings in your

eyes and thorns in your sides, and they shall harass you in the land in which

you live; so that I will do to you what I planned to do to them. (Bamidbar 33:55-56)

These harsh words are even more

hurtful, since we know that they were used as a book title by one of the

leading Jewish racists, Meir Kahanah,

and he built his "philosophy" upon them.

The frequent use of these verses

and of the commands to conquer and annihilate found in various places in the

Torah and in the Book of Joshua has been discussed repeatedly by thinkers and

sages in our generation. Writing more than twenty years ago, my teacher and

uncle, Prof. Efrayim Elimelekh

Urbach, related to "the attempts which we see to

turn the ‘inhuman' into the ‘Jewish,'" and formulated the principles of

his thought and life's philosophy in these words:

Events from our history as well

as verses from Scripture and quotes from the Sages are being adopted as weapons

in the struggles taking place before our eyes. They have often been uprooted

from the locales in which they grew without regard for their contexts;

sometimes they are presented in a deliberately false and inauthentic manner. This

is done both by those who reject our tradition as well as by those who set

themselves up as its guardians and as the watchmen of its walls. The sciences

of Judaism can offer tools that can distinguish between values and vulgarity;

between the eternal and the temporary; between passing excitement and true

religiosity; between simplicity and primitiveness; between the underscoring of self-worth

and the hopeless isolation that makes the term "Judaism" into

something opposed to "humanity." (Ma'ariv

15 Sivan 5744, as quoted by the scholar Meir Ayeli z"l in the

introduction to the pamphlet "HaSegulah

Ve'Hakoah" by my teacher, Prof. Moshe

Greenberg)

Albert Einstein also related to

this in one of his letters:

To my mind, appreciation of the

lives of all creatures constitutes the essence of the Jewish world view. The

individual life is significant only if it serves to improve and ennoble the

lives of all living creatures. Life is holy, that is to say that it is the

supreme value, and all other values are subordinate to it. The sanctification

of extra-personal life brings one to honor every spiritual thing – a quality

especially characteristic of Jewish tradition. (From the Hebrew translation, Ra'ayonot ve'De'ot,

pg. 109)

The question is: How can we

square the passage from the parasha with our world

view? How can we educate our children and students to love humanity in the face

of such harsh and problematic verses?

Prof. Greenberg addressed this

question in page 11 of the above-mentioned pamphlet:

One problem in teaching

Scripture is that it enjoys ultimate authority in the eyes of the student. It

cannot be questioned, nor can its judgments – be they positive or negative – regarding

the characters appearing in it. The teacher recoils from criticizing Scripture

due to the justified fear that he might dishonor it, or even alienate the

student. However, such reluctance carries its own dangers of neglect of the ambivalence

and ambiguity of the events, decisions, and human actions described in the

biblical stories. Our judgment of a particular situation will be flawed to the

extent that we do not recognize how complicated its causes are. When he

matures, the student will have to function as a citizen of a democratic

country; he will have to judge policies and statesmen, choose the people's

representatives and relate to their deeds and failures. He will not be able to

perform his civic duty without acquainting himself with the thicket of

competing and opposing justifications thrown up by every public question and by

every critical consideration of public figures… a deep and understanding

reading of the [Bible's] stories that can uncover the ambivalent presentation

of its heroes: our father Abraham, our rabbi Moses, and King David are not

without faults…

Neither did the Sages nor the

traditional biblical commentators balked at criticizing admired

biblical personalities. For example: the RaMBaN and

others criticized Sarah for expelling Hagar, and

Abraham for having agreed to it.

Greenberg suggests that we allow

the midrashim to come to our

aid, since "the midrash limits the authority of

Scripture by setting up the Sages as a parallel authority… this opens the

door to autonomous thinking about the facts as related by Scripture." Later

he explains the historical background to the call for annihilation and the

Sages' reservations regarding this harsh command. The most interesting midrash cited by Greenberg

completely reverses the significance of the problematic verse:

Ten prophet-priests descended

from Rahab the harlot: Jeremiah, Hilkiyah,

Shariyah, Mehasyah, Hanamel, Shalom, Barukh, Neriah, Ezekiel, Buzi, and some

say that Hulda the prophetess was also a descendant

of Rahab. (Rut Rabbah

2)

Basing themselves on the above midrash, the Sages wrote regarding

our parasha:

The Holy One blessed be He said:

I said, But if you do not dispossess the inhabitants of the land, those whom

you allow to remain shall be stings in your eyes and thorns in your sides (Bamidbar)…

you must proscribe them (Devarim 20:17). Yet they did not do so, but rather:

Joshua let live Rahab the harlot and her father

and her mother. Jeremiah was a descendant of Rahab

and spoke words which were stings in your eyes to Israel, for it is

said, The words of Jeremiah (and he

rebuked them harshly and prophesized evil for them). (Yalkut Shimoni Mase'ei pg. 787)

The spies had left a Canaanite

harlot alive, in contradiction of the Torah's stern commands. They apparently

transgressed these commands, but it was precisely the act of saving Rahab that led to the birth of some of the Jewish people's

greatest prophets. Thus the Sages demonstrated that there is room for the

application of judgment and that the stern and awful command was not actually

executed according to the letter of the law. The Sages also teach us that every

human being as a human being (even if he seems to belong to the margins of

society) bears the potential to change and contribute to society. In addition,

had it not been for Joshua's spies' breach of the rules, Jeremiah would never

have been born, he could never have preached to Israel to return to the

straight and narrow (albeit without great success) in the prophecies which have

been chosen as the haftarot of the first two Shabbatot of bein ha'meitzarim. (Greenberg claims that Jeremiah viewed

the Israelite's deeds in a more critical light precisely because he was the

descendant of converts. His ancestors had freely chosen to join the holy people

and so Jeremiah – in contrast to the "original" Israelites – was more

acutely aware of how they had broken the holy covenant. I chose to read this midrash differently).

Our haftarah

ends with the wonderful verse of consolation:

And swear – as the Lord lives – in

bless themselves by you. (4:2)

I contend that this haftarah's optimistic ending is the key towards grasping

that one must listen to and take into account every human being as a human

being. The treatment of every human being in the spirit of Rabbi Akiva (who, according to the Sages, was himself the

descendant of converts) is realized in traveling a path not of war and

annihilation, but rather of you shall offer them peace (Devarim 20:10), the good and straight path of sincerity,

justice and righteousness (Jeremiah 4:2). That path leads all nations to the

name of the Lord in Jerusalem (verse 3) and causes both them and ourselves

to bless and praise Him – soon and in our days.

Rami Pinchover is an engineer.

Readers Respond

As a loyal reader of Shabbat Shalom who is active in

teaching and inter-faith dialogue (mostly with Christians) I was surprised by

the choice to publish the midrash

which appeared in the Balak issue. The traditional midrashic passage selected (from a book by Yeshayahu Leibowitz) is anti-Christian, it refers to Jesus as "that man," and

places the claim to divinity in his mouth.

Leibowitz's animosity towards Christianity

is well known to us. To my mind, it is one of the less savory facets of that

important thinker, and unworthy of imitation. Earlier and

greater commentators than he –such as the RaMBaM and

the Meiri-offered more conciliatory approaches to

Christianity, calling it a "true religion".

Christianity is the only world religion which includes our

Scriptures among its holy writings. As far as I know, Jesus himself never made

claim to divinity – some of his disciples did, but he never spoke so of

himself.

My main qualm regarding the publication of the midrash is that I would not want

to educate others by its lights (or shadows).

In my humble opinion, the order of the day in our world is

to learn to respect the other and his differences from us, including those

involving matters of faith. Rabbi Yitzhak Greenberg has recently written a book

in which he calls upon religious Jews to view Christians as "covenantal

partners."

Even Rabbi Soleveitchik, who was much

more guarded in his views regarding inter-faith dialogue, tried to encourage

cooperation between Jews and Christians in matters of social justice. I think

that a publication such as Shabbat Shalom should educate towards

tolerance and acceptance of the other. There are enough other forces in our

society – some of whom publish their own parashat

hashavua sheets – who educate towards the hatred

of gentiles.

Dr. Devorah

Weissman – Jerusalem

Pinchas

Leiser, editor of Shabbat Shalom, responds:

a) I certainly agree with Debbie Weisman that we should

educate towards tolerance, acceptance of the other, and respect for all human

beings created in God's image. I think that we have tried to relay that message

over the past years of Shabbat Shalom's existence.

b) I do not hold that the midrash quoted from Yeshayahu

Leibowitz's book is "anti-Christian"; it

makes salient the dangers involved in the deification of humans and the

anthropomorphizing of God. These dangers are present in all religions, and

invite far-reaching theological and educational consequences. Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz's emotional

attitude towards Christianity is irrelevant to this matter.

c) Therefore, I see no contradiction between love of the

stranger, respect towards all humans created in the Divine image, and

theological disagreements which are part of frank dialogue. Education towards

the acceptance of the other requires us to recognize these differences and not

to blur them.

Dismiss the Refusenik Officers, Try those who Incite Refusal

Refusal to follow orders, whether it be the marginal

phenomenon of refusal from the left, or the mass refusal to obey orders from

the right which threatens our community (the religious Zionists), is

illegitimate, obscene, and dangerous. It is illegitimate because it contradicts

the law in a state ruled by law; it is obscene, because there are many legal

ways to express one's political opinions, and dangerous, because, to our great

sorrow, the State of Israel is surrounded by enemies and will need a strong and

disciplined army for many years into the future.

Like many from the left and center, I gave quite a few years

to military service that was, by turns, stupid, unnecessary, and wicked, in the

occupation of half of Lebanon or the defense of settlements which have no

future. Nevertheless I did my duty because refusal would cut the branch on

which we sit out from under us – God's gift of a sovereign Jewish state founded

upon democratic principles and the rule of law. So I thought then, as I still

do today, and I think my commanders agreed with me. If I thought that my

commanders selected the orders they were willing to follow, or that they

changed them, following their own conscience, if I thought that they had

replaced the second paragraph of the basic law of the army – "the army is

subject to the government's authority" with "every soldier is subject

to the authority of his own conscience" (as a colonel suggested on

television) – I would not have served there. In order to preserve Israel's

military strength and security, every commander who expresses his approval of

conscientious objection must be dismissed from all command roles.

All those who espouse draft-evasion or refusal to follow

orders must be dealt with equally by the law, be they important or unimportant,

including rabbis who "send forth people to sin", those who start

petitions and those who make so-called "halakhic

decisions." Paragraphs 109 and 110 of the Penal Code are explicit: "One

who incites or persuades a person who is required to serve in the armed forces

not to serve, or not to show up for a military operation is subject to five

years imprisonment; [one who incites or persuades a person who is required to

serve in the armed forces to] not to follow a legal order is subject to one year's

imprisonment." The calls for refusal which refer to the evacuation as "an

immoral expulsion" are nothing but an attempt to force the majority of the

state's population and its chosen government to annex the evacuees and their

settlements to the state of Israel. The rule of law is crucial for us, and the

time has come to apply it – and that is also the clear halakhic

ruling.

Rabbi Hanokh

Goldberg, Attorney at Law

Editor's comment:

Israeli society is going through a difficult period, in

which disagreements within the public in general and within religious Zionism

in particular have become more acute.

This letter opens an important discussion regarding the

legitimate limits of the deep debate concerning the Torah's scale of values

regarding various issues and the manner in which to maintain a Jewish and

democratic state. In the past few weeks an important article dealing at length

with this issue has been distributed. It is written by Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein, Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat

Har Etzion, and has also

been published by the Haaretz newspaper.

We invite our readers to discuss these issues, while

demonstrating respect towards the various viewpoints.

If you enjoy Shabbat Shalom,

please consider contributing towards its publication and distribution.

• Hebrew

  edition distributed in Israel $700

• English

  edition distributed via email $ 100

Issues may be dedicated in honor

of an event, person, simcha, etc. Requests must be

made 3-4 weeks in advance to appear in the Hebrew, 10 days in advance to appear

in the English email.

In Israel, checks made out

to Oz VeShalom may be sent to Oz VeShalom-P.O.B.

4433, Jerusalem 91043. Unfortunately there is no Israeli tax-exemption for

local donations.

US and British tax exempt contributions to Oz VeShalom may be made through:

New Israel Fund, POB 91588,

Washington, DC 20090-1588, USA

New Israel Fund of Great Britain, 26 Enford

Street, London W1H 2DD, Great Britain

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NEW ISRAEL

FUND IS NO LONGER ACCEPTING DONATIONS UNDER $100.

PEF will also channel donations and provide a tax-exemption. Donations

should be sent to P.E.F. Israel Endowment Funds, Inc., 317 Madison

Ave., Suite 607, New York, New York 10017 USA

All contributions should be

marked as donor-advised to Oz ve'Shalom, the Shabbat

Shalom project.

About us

Oz Veshalom-Netivot

Shalom is a movement dedicated to the advancement of a civil society in Israel.

It is committed to promoting the ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and justice,

concepts which have always been central to Jewish tradition and law.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot

Shalom shares a deep attachment to the land of Israel and it no less views

peace as a central religious value. It believes that Jews have both the

religious and the national obligation to support the pursuit of peace. It

maintains that Jewish law clearly requires us to create a fair and just society,

and that co-existence between Jews and Arabs is not an option but an

imperative.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot

Shalom's programs include both educational and

protest activities. Seminars, lectures, workshops, conferences and weekend

programs are held for students, educators and families, as well as joint

seminars for Jews, Israeli Arabs and Palestinians. Protest activities focus on

issues of human rights, co-existence between Jews and Arabs, and responses to

issues of particular religious relevance.

5,000 copies of a 4 page peace

oriented commentary on the weekly Torah reading are written and published by Oz

VeShalom/Netivot Shalom and they are distributed to

over 350 synagogues in Israel and are sent overseas via email. Our web site is www.netivot-shalom.org.il

Oz Veshalom-Netivot

Shalom's educational forums draw people of different

backgrounds, secular and religious, who are keen to deepen their Jewish

knowledge and to hear an alternative religious standpoint on the subjects of

peace and social issues.

Oz Veshalom-Netivot

Shalom fills an ideological vacuum in Israel's society. Committed both to

Jewish tradition and observance, and to the furthering of peace and

coexistence, the movement is in a unique position to engage in dialogue with

the secular left and the religious right, with Israeli Arabs and with

Palestinians.